메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서울대학교 인문학연구원 인문논총 인문논총 제71권 제2호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
357 - 385 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study offers an Agambenian interpretation of Machiavelli’s use ofhistorical examples in The Prince. I show how, even as Machiavelli insistson the impunity with which the prince can and should transgress traditionalnorms of political action for the sake of his personal safety and thestability of the body politic, his historical examples, initially appearingfragmentarily for illustrative purposes, gradually snowball into stories ofthe fall, as well as the rise, of princes. If the prince can rule on himselfas being exceptional to conventional ethical and moral parameters of statecraft,he can, in turn, also be ruled as exceptional to the safeguards afforded by traditional moralities. Without being explicit about it,Machiavelli effectively anticipates the paradoxical duality of sovereign exceptionality,famously conceptualized by Giorgio Agamben, according towhich the necessary correlative to the prince’s capacity to create homosacer is his suppressed identity as another homo sacer. The duality ironicallyopens up the possibility that Machiavelli’s own discourse with itsemphasis on serving the current ruler of the state can indiscriminatelyserve the illegitimate, as well as the legitimate, ruler and even would-beusurpers. It is this consciousness of the paradoxical nature of his own discoursethat motivates Machiavelli’s insistence on martial virtuosity as theonly princely virtue, his categorical distinction between princely virtù andthe subject’s virtue, and his call to Lorenzo Medici to bring order to Italyin a state of primordial chaos.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0