메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서울대학교 인문학연구원 인문논총 인문논총 제66권
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
179 - 208 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Nelson Goodman contends that we make worlds by making worldversions. Though Israel Scheffler approves of Goodman's epistemological pluralism, he cannot accept Goodman’s thesis of worldmaking. He disagrees with Goodman in that he cannot accept the idea that we make the things to which our versions refer. For Goodman, we make a star by putting its parts together and marking off its boundaries. Scheffler argues that just because we make words, it does not follow that we make a star our words describe; it exists independent of us. I try to make plausible the idea of worldmaking. Following Goodman’s rejection of the distiction between natural and artificial kinds and the convention/fact dualism, I think it may be crucial in arguing for the contention that there is no independent world with fixed properties. I believe that our choice of convention or version creates or shapes content or the things of a world. For Goodman, art also contributes to the making of worlds. I discuss it in case of painting. I examine Goodman’s view of pictorial reference to show how paintings can have cognitive content. Here, it is remarkable that exemplification is a mode of reference whereby a painting refers to its own features. I also discuss that the discrimination of style is an integral aspect to get the insight paintings present.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0