메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서울대학교 인문학연구원 인문논총 인문논총 제66권
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
99 - 139 (41page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
According to the view-point that occupies the leading position in the history of comparative research of Nietzsche’s philosophy and Buddhism so far, there are strong similarities between the two and Nietzsche’s Overman is identical with Buddha. Contrary to this view-point, this article tries to demonstrate that between Nietzsche’s philosophy and Buddhism the differences are more fundamental than the similarities, even though it is undeniable that there are certain similarities between the two. And unlike the existing researches that tried to reveal the differences between Nietzsche’s philosophy and Buddhism by taking Nietzsche’s thoughts of the eternal return of the same and the concept of the will to power as major clues for the comparison, this article will show the differences between the two and the limits of Nietzsche’s philosophy more concretely and more clearly by comparing Nietzsche’s and buddhist views on the virtues that the ideal human-beings should realize. Nietzsche finds such virtues in pride, pathos of distance, flush vigor, strong and tough spirit, while Buddhism finds such virtues in love and kindness, pity and caring, sharing the joys of all living beings, calmness. In addition, Nietzsche finds the rul-ing principle of the world in the war between all things like Heraclitus,while Buddhism thinks that all things in the world help each other. On the basis of these comparisons, we can say that Nietzsche’s philosophy was not able to overcome the spirit that sees itself as being confronted with the other people and the world.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (47)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0