메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서울대학교 인문학연구원 인문논총 인문논총 제69호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
159 - 188 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Virtue ethics has solved the disadvantages which come from Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics and so is esteemed as a rival ethical theory to normative ethics. It is much criticized by Utilitarian and Kantian ethics. Those who adhere to virtue ethics should be able to answer to the criticisms presented by utilitarian and Kantian ethics. In this paper, I present an explanation on the relation of the virtuous agent to right action, because this explanation allows room to understand how one may be a virtuous person and what are the things that a virtuous person does, this being one of the criticisms thrown towards virtue ethics. I first broadly examine the priority of aretaic evaluation in character trait over normative evaluation in action, because the relation between the virtuous agent and right action can be explained by different views in the priority of aretaic evaluation. I also consider the technical manual model, role model, and developmental model and suggest that the developmental model is the most appropriate as a proper model of being a virtuous agent in virtue ethics. While having argument about a formula about right action in virtue ethics’ and a condition “agent knows” on an act’s being done in Nicomachean Ethics.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0