메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한한의학원전학회 대한한의학원전학회지 대한한의학원전학회지 제23권 제5호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
103 - 116 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Maekgyung(脈經) was the first book for diagnostic method in traditional Chinese medicine history, but it couldn't be spreaded widely. After that, Maekgyeol(脈訣) was widely spreaded for centuries, because it was more concise and easier to memorize than Maekgyung. But as time went by, people got to know that Maekgyeol had many errors. After Maekgyeolganoh(脈訣刊誤) corrected the errors of Maekgyeol, Maekgyeol came to lose its reputation and people began to study Binhomaekhak(瀕湖脈學) instead of Maekgyeol. We got to wonder why Maekgyeol was criticized by many people, so we decided to compare the definitions of pulses(脈象) in Maekgyung and Maekgyeol and Maekgyeolganoh. Both Maekgyung and Maekgyeol have 24 kinds of pulses, but 22 kinds are in common. In 22 kinds of pulses, only 2 kinds of definitions are similar and the others are different. And Maekgyeolganoh criticized errors of Maekgyeol and corrected the definitions by that of Maekgyung. In conclusion, we come to know that Maekgyeol was rejected by people because it defined most of pulses different from Maekgyung.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (7)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0