메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국문학교육학회 문학교육학 문학교육학 제41호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
339 - 372 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study is focused on the comparison of the learning methods regarding the text-centered, responds-centered, and constructivism literature education. The comparisons of the three literature education paradigms are as follow. First, the text centered literature education which occurred in the late 1st educational course is based on the behaviorism. It leaves out the both reading activities and progress of learners which re-composes literature meaning, and only provides the answers from the authoritative critics. Therefore, it can be leads to the conventional problems such as teacher-centered, result-centered paradigms. Second, the response based literature education paradigm had succeed in paradigm shift by moving the literature reading focus from ‘text’ to ‘learner’, and ‘result’ to ‘progress’. It excludes the literature knowledge on purpose, while promoting the learners’ responses. For that reason, the learning contents become uncertain, and it can also cause the problems regarding specific learning methods. Lastly, the constructivist literature education which started since 1998, brings back the literature knowledge to the ground and insists to teach ‘genre knowledge’ that can interpret empirical knowledge besides the Ontological knowledge in the past newcriticism. In conclusion, we need to search for the right educational methods based on the comprehends of past literature paradigm shifts to generate the actual changes in our literature education.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0