메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국문학교육학회 문학교육학 문학교육학 제39호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
33 - 59 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article aims at reconsidering education and literature in the early modern period of enlightenment with the case of Haehak Lee Gi, one of the traditional intellectuals in that period. Lee Gi was a traditional intellectual who made efforts to maintain his own independent viewpoint even in the period of the overwhelming Western power and the right of the strongest. He made points of the vices of flunkeyism, use of Chinese characters, and class discrimination on the side of convention and presented independence, use of Hangeul, and equalitarianism, while he claimed on the side of the theory of education that people should be made group members who could communicate with each other, exchange each other’s knowledge to share their recognition as they would receive equal school education aiming at the restoration of the national regime without class discrimination. Though he was a traditional Confucian scholar, he also devoted himself to the introduction of modern sciences as he desperately realized that the new learning would be what Koreans should pursue in future. However, while doing so, he maintained his attitude with which he tried to attain the basic spirit from the early Confucianism. His writing was focused on the reform of the ruling class’ awareness just as he himself began with a thorough self-reflection. The fact that allegoric writing, one of the traditional methods of writing, was considerably used in his articles is also related to this. Lee Gi’s achievements cannot be said to be brilliant in comparison with those by Park Eun-sik, Sin Chae-ho etc., who at that time found the national spirit, the nation from Korean history and Hangeul texts and left literary writings for the extension of their findings. However, he is a figure of another type of intellectuals in the early modern period of enlightenment as he reflected always on the basis of traditional things while engaged in enlightenment discourses with his recognition of changing conditions.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0