메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국로렌스학회 D. H. 로렌스 연구 D. H. 로렌스 연구 제19권 제1호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
59 - 72 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Many of the poems in Pansies are jeremiads of a sort-angry tirades against the nullity of modern life, lamentations for man less than Man. What the design of Pansies is intended to follow is the essential relativity of truth. This book is not an argument, as Lawrence rightly says, and there is no logical development of political or philosophical thought. Pansies is not thought, but ‘thoughts,’ and as such it is committed to no unity of idea or message. Variety, transience and a kind of organic wholeness are the three major criteria, that Lawrence himself set up for Pansies. These poems are various; certainly Lawrence strove to cast each in its own inevitable organic form; and he hoped that each would somehow embody the transience of “the immediate present.” Furthermore, says Lawrence, these poems are emphatically to be “a bunch of pansies, not a wreath of immortells” Their transiency is not to be an embodiment of the eternal moment that Lawrence defined in “Poetry of the Present” as “the quick of all time, the quick of all the universe.” His assertion in the introduction to Pansies Ⅰ that “it suits the modern temper better to have its state of mind made apparently irrelevant thoughts that scurry in different directions yet belong to the same nest, indicates how careful he was in his formulation of his own method. What matters is that Lawrence's passionate effort of attention to his own ideas is effective.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (12)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0