메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영미시학회 현대영미시연구 현대영미시연구 제20권 제1호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
65 - 91 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay examines the spirituality of nature evidenced in the poetry ofEmily Dickinson and Mary Oliver by comparing the nature poems of bothpoets in terms of how they envision kinship to nature and coexistence withnature. The poems’ nature spirituality reflects a complex ecologicalconsciousness based on the balancing of kinship with and alienation fromnature. On the one hand, nature and human beings are depicted as livingharmoniously, as fellows, brothers, and sisters. Thereby, both poets’ worksresonate deeply with the spirit of St. Francis of Assisi. On the other hand,Dickinson and Oliver recognize a gap between the human and nonhuman. Intheir works, both poets personify nature to bridge the gap between the twoentities. In this sense, both poets’ nature spirituality is related to what Brysoncalls “the place-spaciousness of nature,” an intermingling of “a sense of place(domesticity)” and “a sense of space(wildness)” espoused by Yi-Fu Tuan. Dickinson wrote poems about her “fellow” snakes in which she revealsfamiliarity with and alienation from them, echoing the Tuanian concepts ofplace and space. Although she often displays a greater familiarity with her“brother” snakes than does Dickinson, Oliver sometimes inadvertently disclosesher uneasiness with them. Like Dickinson’s poems, Oliver’s snake poems revealnature spirituality through the paradoxical experience of connection andseparation. Both poets’ awareness of nature’s otherness as well as its kinshipcreates a dynamic tension in their poems, which challenges the reader to forgea reconciliation in the act of reading.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0