메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영미시학회 현대영미시연구 현대영미시연구 제20권 제2호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
197 - 239 (43page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The human condition, defined by Karl Mannheim, is that human beings cannot think or live without their history and society into which they are born: Seinsgebudenheit des Gedenks. It is taken for granted that poets are also confined into such a human condition. T. S. Eliot and Robert Lowell are deeply concerned with history. But their attitudes toward history are far different from each other. T. S. Eliot expressed a quite negative view of western history in his early poetry. After his conversion, T. S. Eliot’s view of history became optimistic. He finds that history will progress; the future will be better. His fusion of different zeitheits shows that he strongly believed in the existence of the world after death. That is to say, his concept of history and time is not linear, but circular. Unlike that of T. S. Eliot, Lowell’s view of history is consistent: history is not progressive at all; more or less, it has grown worse. The evaluation of his ancestors is caustic and rigid. He even underestimates their contribution to the foundation of American civilization and culture. The two poets were almost contemporaries, and their recognition of the age was almost the same at the start of their careers. But their recognition of history developed in different directions, which, I believe, result from their distinctive attitudes toward Christianity.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0