메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영미시학회 현대영미시연구 현대영미시연구 제17권 제1호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
149 - 183 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper seeks to examine the difference between T. S. Eliot and Robert Lowell in terms of their attituds toward Christian belief and the Christian way of life. The former was born into a Unitarian family, and the latter into a well-known Boston Brahmin family. Neither was satisfied with his family religion and his ancestors’ practice of Christianity. For example, T. S. Eliot converted to the Church of England because he believed that Unitarianism is not good enough to redeem modern society and people; also, Robert Lowell was in severe friction with his Puritan ancestors all throughout his life. After his conversion to the Church of England, T. S. Eliot thought that modern society and its citizens could be cured from their modern malady through the recovery of Christianity. For example, in “Ash-Wednesday”, the speaker says that even if he is in frustration, he is able to come close to God. However, Robert Lowell converted to Catholicism because of his conflict with ancestors whose religious attitude and practices he found abominable. In the long run, he also left behind the Catholic church. His poetic journey from Lord Weary’s Castle to Life Studies is not only a record of his resistance against his family religion, Puritanism, but also an expression of his discontents toward the Christian way of life. Yet their attitudes to Christianity were totally different: Eliot believed in the possibility of Christianity in terms of its redemption of modern society which, he strongly believed, was in complete corruption; but Lowell ultimately denied Christianity itself.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0