메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비교정부학회 한국비교정부학보 한국비교정부학보 제18권 제2호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
1 - 36 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Soon-Eun KimThe purpose of this study is to analyze various forms of urban public service reform and frameworks of regulations attached to the reform. Since the 1990s Korea as well as Japan succeeded in reforming delivery vehicles for urban public services, including executive agencies, competitive tendering, contracting out, designated manager and private finance initiative, etc. It was also found that different frameworks of regulations were coined not only in laws and by-laws in order to maintain public nature of urban public services even though their delivery systems were reformed. This study shows that Japan has been more successful in reforming urban public services in terms of quantity and quality of reform. While Japan has adopted a variety of ways and means for producing urban public services such as executive agencies, public-private competitive tendering, contacting-out, designated manager and private finance initiative, Korea had not depended on public-private competitive tendering and designated manager. The number of executive agencies at the local level in Korea is only three whereas that of executive agencies at the local level in Japan is more than 100. In addition, the breadth of regulation attached to means of reform measures in Japan is wider and deeper than that of Korea. In particular, regulation of information opening and democratic control are strongly emphasized in Japan in comparison with Korea.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (41)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0