메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국전문경영인학회 전문경영인연구 전문경영인연구 제14권 제3호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
181 - 198 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Post Keynesian deal with the so-called finance in many different ways. It seems quite clear that they deploy the same notion of 'finance' in mutually incompatible cases. Responding to the critique that multiplier process is deterred by the deficiency of saving, they retort that 'finance' is revolving fund, which has nothing to do with saving. According to this explication, the main function of 'finance' in nothing other than making investment possible. On the other hand, some post Keynesians delineate 'finance' as a link between real monetary sectors. Emphasizing the interdependence between real and monetary sectors, they argue that demand for money is not independent of the events in the real sector. Their argument, however, entails that the multiplier effect is decreasing. In addition, the so-called endogenous money theorists, who are opposed to the liquidity preference theory, put a stress on 'finance' in order to make an argument that Keynes was an endogenous money theorist. At this juncture, it is worthwhile to point out that Keynes make use of 'finance' to defend his liquidity preference theory.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0