메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비교형사법학회 비교형사법연구 비교형사법연구 제13권 제1호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
21 - 48 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The existing sentencing guidelines can be positively assessed in that the guidelines pursued balance between sentencing theory and sentencing guidelines based on the theory of scope of responsibility, but the existing guidelines do not always accord with the theory because the existing guidelines excessively depended on sentencing practices in the past when scope of penality and sentencing factors are classified but did not mention modification of scope of responsibility. In this context, the author in this study considered appropriateness of the (adjusted) theory of scope of responsibility by reviewing sentencing theories to present measures of improvements in sentencing guidelines. The principles of the adjustment for improving sentencing guidelines can be as follows. First, scope of penalty should be modified and overlapping in the scope should be solved. Second, basic recommendation penalty should be established. Third, special sentencing factors and general sentencing factors should be adjusted. Special sentencing factors can be defined to be factors related to illegality and responsibility of criminal acts and general sentencing factors can be defined to be factors related to situations before and after a crime and prevention. Fourth, differentiation of behavior factors and agent/other factors should be removed. Fifth, scope of penalty should be specifically adjusted on the basis of the number of special sentencing factors.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (35)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0