메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비교형사법학회 비교형사법연구 비교형사법연구 제13권 제2호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
89 - 111 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is stipulated in Article 5 of the Korean Consumer Framework Act that consumers can legitimately exercise their fundamental rights granted under its Article 4. But the Act does not give any answers regarding whether the consumer boycott is justifiable, or whether it incurs any civil or criminal liabilities. Because there is no provision regulating consumer boycotts under the Act, it is possible that consumers involved are punished in accordance with Article 314 of the Korean Penal Code. When the so-called candlelight vigil against US beef imports was held in 2008, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the defendants, who boycotted goods from three newspaper companies, to be guilty in regards to the violations against for 1st Section of Article 314, Article 324, and 1st Section of Article 350 of the Penal Code. In this context, the legality of consumer boycott needs to be critically considered. Also, it should be inquired into if the criminal regulations of consumer boycotts have validity from the constitutional perspective. If consumer boycotts meet certain basic requirements, for example (i) public interests (ii) subject of rights (iii) peaceful means (iv) self-activity (v) fair information etc, consumers have to be immune from civil or criminal responsibilities with respect to those boycotts. Therefore, it is unfair to apply the above-mentioned criminal provisions to consumer boycotts without no careful consideration of its justifications. The court plays a key role in supporting the activities of corporations or companies. Therefore, with no specific provision to regulate consumer boycotts, the court needs to take into account such requirements as its purpose, subject, means, etc in the case. And the validity of criminal regulations should be reviewed, only when it is assessed that consumer boycotts deviate from constitutional limits given.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (35)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0