지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper treats which two perspectives, namely unity of legal order and identity of criminal law can be applied as concrete forms of interpretation in criminal law or not. To answer this question, I examined the characteristics of these requests and their roles in the interpretation of criminal law. My opinion is that these requests can be regarded as legal principles, and therefore they can be used as forms of argumentation in the interpretation of criminal law like other methods or arguments of interpretation or other principles. But so far as man regards them as kinds of principles, there is a limit in applying them. The very limit is that legal principles must be used only subsidiarily in the interpretation of criminal law(so-called 'subsidiarity of principle-application'). In other words, this means that legal principles can be applied to interpret the concepts or words of criminal law just in case the relatively concrete arguments or forms of interpretation can not be used. The same applies to the other principles.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (20)
참고문헌 신청
/ / 大判 1987.2.10, 86도2472
Robert Alexy / 1979 / Zum Begriff des Rechtsprinzips, In Argumentation und Hermeneutik in der Jurisprudenz : 63 ~
Ronald Dworkin / 1994 / The Model of RulesⅠ, In Taking Rights Seriously(7 edit.) : 24 ~
권오걸 / 2009 / 형법각론[이론·판례] / 형설출판사 : 151 ~
김상호 / 2004 / 형법각론 / 세종출판사 : 132 ~
Robert Alexy / 1979 / Zum Begriff des Rechtsprinzips, In Argumentation und Hermeneutik in der Jurisprudenz : 63 ~
Ronald Dworkin / 1994 / The Model of RulesⅠ, In Taking Rights Seriously(7 edit.) : 24 ~
권오걸 / 2009 / 형법각론[이론·판례] / 형설출판사 : 151 ~
김상호 / 2004 / 형법각론 / 세종출판사 : 132 ~
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0