메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영미문학페미니즘학회 영미문학페미니즘 영미문학페미니즘 제21권 제1호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
39 - 66 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In The Critical Response to Ralph Ellison, Robert J. Butler ends his overview of Invisible Man’s critical reception by stating, “Certainly much more needs to be said about Ellison’s envisioning of female experience and how feminine values are an important part of his vision” (xxxvii). Much more needs to be said because Ellison’s stance on the experiences of females has not been so clear, especially in his epic novel, Invisible Man. The question remains: Is Ellison’s widely-read novel a critique of sexism in America or is the novel itself deeply marred by it? This article revisits the second chapter of Invisible Man ― the “Trueblood episode” ― to argue that Ellison has Jim Trueblood fashion a crude story of father-daughter incest to combat the impotence brought on by a white male supremacist society that bonds together over racism. Although many have correctly claimed that Trueblood’s tall tale is told at the expense of his daughter, who, like most of the female characters in the book, is denied complexity and humanity, this article argues that Ellison’s chapter subtly challenges patriarchal phallocentrism by hinting at a proto-feminist message in suggesting what some feminists would later claim ― that father-daughter incest is a normal function of heteropatriarchy, not a breakdown in the social order.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0