메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국세계지역학회 세계지역연구논총 세계지역연구논총 제30권 제2호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
217 - 241 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Modernization theorists argue that once a country passes $6,000 GDP per capita, it is substantially poised to succeed in its transition to democracy. Nevertheless, Malaysia, which has well passed the threshold of GDP per capita, still maintains authoritarian government. This paper comprehends the limitations of structural variables that are proclaimed by modernization theory to be crucial for democratic transition and will prove that civil society variable is more persuasive in explaining the different processes of democratic transition in South Korea and Malaysia. South Korea and Malaysia are similar in that both countries fit the model of a “strong state,” and their difference lies in civil society. South Korea is uniquely homogeneous in ethnicity, religion, and language, while Malaysia has high degree of social cleavage and diversity. O’Donnell and Schmitter pointed out that the “resurrection of civil society” should precede the democratic transition. While South Korea experienced it in 1987, Malaysian civil society is yet fragmented due to the heterogeneous characteristics of its civil society. Therefore, the most urgent need for democratic transition in Malaysia seems to require trust-building among the diverse social groups and share democratic values, which eventually will lead to the “resurrection of civil society.”

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0