지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Postposition is proven to be largely used as function word because its functional role is highlighted rather than lexical meaning going through the decategorization process depending on grammaticalization of lexemes that have separate lexical meanings. At the same time, such a premise means that postposition is unclear, but has separate meanings. This study discusses that such a categorical modification of postposition in modern Mongolian language can be explained in the following procedure. If concluding that there exists an one-way modification process and postposition that largely plays a grammatical function is three-dimensional category of grammar, it is considered that postposition originated from the one- and two-dimensional category of grammar such as noun, verb, adjective, and adverb and underwent synchronic modification of conjunction, pronoun, auxiliary verb, and demonstrative within the same category of grammar. At the same time, this study discusses the possibility of acknowledgement and understanding of disturbance in part of speech from the perspective of grammaticalization of postposition through the continuous variation system grammaticality presented by Hopper & Traugott(2003: 7) in Muriel Norde(2013: 17). This study also considered that the difference in the semantic transparency among postpositions is attributable to the fact that either lexeme or function word is highlighted depending on the progression of grammaticalization. At the same time, this study considered that the objects of being postpositions in Mongolian language depends on researcher's opinion or judgment and quantitative numerical value can be changed frequently due to the floating nature of grammaticalization. One-form-and-one-function principle is considered as an inappropriate theory from the perspective of grammaticalization and is quite different from reality in that the meanings of vocabulary are presented in polysemic words through the meaning chain of grammaticalization of lexical meanings or conversely that allomorphic elements perform similar meanings and functions.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
?н?рбаян, Ц / 2004 / Орчин цагийн монгол хэлний ?г з?й
B. Heine / 1993 / Conceptual Schift / AAP 34
Buck, Holden Frederick / 1955 / Harvard-Yenching Institute Studies XII / Harvard University Press
Charles Bawden / 1997 / Mongolian-English Dictionary / Columbia University Press
Kullmann, Rita / 1996 / Mongolian Grammar / Jensco Ltd
B. Heine / 1993 / Conceptual Schift / AAP 34
Buck, Holden Frederick / 1955 / Harvard-Yenching Institute Studies XII / Harvard University Press
Charles Bawden / 1997 / Mongolian-English Dictionary / Columbia University Press
Kullmann, Rita / 1996 / Mongolian Grammar / Jensco Ltd
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0