메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국몽골학회 몽골학 몽골학 제48호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
167 - 199 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to review the media reports inside and outside Mongolia regarding the permanent neutrality policy that drew the interest of the Mongolian and international society for the past year and a half, and to comprehensively study the contents and future prospects of the discussion on the permanent neutrality based on the review. Many discussions took place immediately after President Ts. Elbegdorj of Mongolia proposed the permanent neutrality policy in September 7th 2015, and the controversy, though its intensity has lessened, continues to this day. It is said that approximately 80 specialist editorials and press interviews and 19 debates took place within the six months from the President’s proposition to March 18th 2016, though the numbers may not be totally accurate. This shows there was a lot of discussion within a short period of time, which indicates the tremendous amount of attention the topic received. On a different level, there exists a complexly entwined structure of conflicts between factions regarding Mongolia’s foreign policy, and competition between the two neighbors(China and Russia) and the third neighbors(USA, Japan, Germany, India, South Korea etc.). Therefore, reviewing the pros and cons of the permanent neutrality policy will be of great assistance to understanding the essence of Mongolia’s foreign policy, the position of each faction concerning the issue, and the positions of the two neighbors and the third neighbors regarding Mongolia etc. The discussion of this paper starts from this point. The discussion is developed in the order of the pros and cons of the permanent neutrality policy and the response of the international society. The primary data used in this paper was limited to media reports on the issue, including published articles and interviews by experts, simple reports and editorials written by journalists. This was to hear the real opinions of experts regarding this topic and due to the judgement that press editorials and interviews would be sufficient in comprehending the thoughts of the experts.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (54)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0