메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국재산법학회 재산법연구 재산법연구 제26권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
313 - 348 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The integration of consumer protection laws, including the Standardized Contract Terms Regulating Act, into the Civil Code belongs to one of the hottest potatoes in the current discourses for preparations of the new draft of the revised Korean Civil Code, in the forms of such questions as: “Is it necessary, and how much?” This article will scrutinize the integration problem from the comparative perspective, with the special focus on the implications from the French experiences. Tracing all the discussions from Saleilles' adhesion contract theory(1901) through enactment of the Consumption Code(1993) to the newly publicized Contract Code draft by the French Ministry of Justice(2008), the author could infer some lessons as follow: Firstly, consumer protection law is a kind of newcomer in comparison with law of contract, but that has played and will play so important a role in the practical and theoretical developments of this, that we should improve the current situation of almost completely disconnected relationship between them. Secondly, though law of contract and consumer protection law shares much each other, it should be admitted that they differ in purposes or ideas, as well as legislative techniques. Thirdly, there are urgent preparations to be taken right now: to establish minimal clauses on principles of consumer law within the civil code, and to build up the legal system of consumer (private) law, including the out-of-dated Standardized Contract Terms Regulating Act, for now as well as for the future.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (36)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0