메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제24권 제4호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
33 - 67 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The raison d'être of conditions of qualified merger is to cope with tax evasive transaction which disguised as merger. There maybe two type of legislative approach. The one is to prescribe the comprehensive conditions and general anti-abuse rule, the other is to prescribe the detailed conditions and not the general anti-abuse rule(“GAAR”). From the perspective of comparative law, U.S.A and Germany have the former system, whereas Korean has the latter system. Japan has the eclectic system. Since the merger tax regime is to expedite the merger which is required of economic necessity, it is desirable to place a flexible conditions and also a GAAR. However, if there is little predictability in application of GAAR, it will constrict the merger transaction to the contrary. Our merger tax regime has very detailed and complex rules but does not have GAAR. It is to enhance the legal stability. Hence there is almost no merger case which is taxed. But the transaction structures are seemed to be distorted in many cases and there maybe many disguised merger transactions which are in fact a tax evasive transaction. However at the present stage, if we place a GAAR, the volume of merger transactions will decrease dramatically the reliability on the tax office being very low. From a long-term perspective, when the overall conditions(sound sense of tax payment, reliability on the tax administration) are prepared, we may consider the merger tax regime to be shifted to the U.S.A. or German system.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0