메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제23권 제4호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
309 - 342 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In 2007, the Ministry of Justice(MOJ) proposed newly introduced exemption clause in the Commercial Act Ⅳ(Insurance). According to amendment bill art.2of732(Prohibition of seizure to insurance claims), the debtor was banned for a seizer of death benefit to the amount equivalent to one half of the death benefit. Exemption clause was legislated already in various Korean laws, e.g. Civil Execution Act §246 sec.7., Postal Savings and Insurance Act §§. 30 and 45. etc. Such laws originated from U.S. In many states, courts at common law often kept insurance proceeds payable to an insured's widow or dependent children beyond the reach of creditors, even in the absence of any statute, so the beneficiaries would not become wards of the state. For most states in U.S, enacted exemption clause. But every state and the District of Columbia have differing statutes concerning the exemption of insurance proceeds. In some states provide in Insurance act and other states in Civil procedure act or Bankruptcy act. New York Insurance law and California Civil procedure act are typical legislation. An overview of life insurance exemption law indicates that many states don't limit the amount of life insurance that is exempt, but some states limited definitive amount e.g. $300. because life insurance is more often being used by the wealthy and financially sophisticated for estate planning far beyond the care and support of their dependants. But art.2 of 732 of bill prohibit to seizer for the 50% rate of the death benefit regardless of the size of the amount of insurance sums. Art.2 of 732 was criticized that this clause infringement of the rights of creditors overly and resulted the rich-get-richer and the poor-get-poorer under the sacrifice of the creditor. In Feb. 5. 2013, The MOJ resubmit the amendment bill of Insurance act and the prohibition clause(art.2 of 732) was eliminated in the recent bill. The writer emphasize that the definitive amount limitation model as New york state Insurance law is better then rate limitation model, If the exemption clause was enacted in the future.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0