메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제23권 제2호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
329 - 373 (45page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A suicide clause typically covers the first one or two years that the policy is in force, depending on the insurance company. If suicide occurs during that time period, the insurer will only return to the policyholder's beneficiaries any premiums that have been paid to that point. If suicide occurs after the clause period, the insurer cannot deny coverage by exclusion period clause. Nowadays, this aspect is regulated by legislation and many states require a statutory suicide clause to be included in the policy terms. The statutory clause varies in each countries. Most countries have a two year exclusion period. Some provide only one year or three years period. It is deemed that keeping up the resolve to die for two years is a rare occurrence, even when considerable money is at stake. This is why generally a two year limitation applies. In Korea the exclusion period clause was provided in standard general conditions written by financial supervisory authority. In a recent years, as Korea's suicide rate becoming the top in the world, large amount of death benefit was paid for suicide death by insurer. With the exponential growth of death benefit, FSC and FSA announced that they under reviewing whether or not the extension of exclusion period. The writer do not oppose the extension, but emphasize that should be a good enough reason to convince consumers.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (52)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0