메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제23권 제2호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
405 - 433 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Subject to article 12, article 11 provides that a contract of sale need not be concluded in writing and is not subject to any other specific requirement as to form. The provision thus establishes the principle of freedom from form requirements or in other words, as one court has stated, under article 11 CISG, a contract of sale can be concluded informally. According to case law this means that a contract can be concluded orally and through the conduct of the parties. Article 11 has also been invoked in holding that a party’s signature was not required for a valid contract. Furthermore writing includes telegram and telex under CISG. Article 29 addresses modification of an already concluded contract by agreement of the parties. According to article 29 (1), the mere consent of the parties is sufficient to effect such a modification or termination. If, however, the parties have agreed in writing that a modification or termination of their contract must be done in writing, paragraph 2 provides that the contract cannot be otherwise modified or terminated although a party’s conduct may preclude it from asserting such a provision to the extent that the other party has relied on that conduct. Related to the declarations that CISG rules which dispense with requirements of written form do not apply when a party is located in a declaring contracting state as article 96.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0