메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제22권 제4호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
89 - 117 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Korean Commercial Code, as amended in April 2011, established a compliance control system applicable to listed companies over a certain size, and requires the appointment of a compliance officer to implement the compliance control system. In response, many companies have argued that there are currently audit functions already in place which overlap with the compliance control and compliance officer systems, and that the implementation of the new systems increases the economic burden on the relevant companies. On the other hand, academics and attorney organization have generally welcomed the new systems, insisting that they will foster corporate compliance and management transparency, which will be beneficial to these companies. Sharp conflicts between the two sides have become a big issue. In my opinion, the compliance control and the compliance officer systems will function to benefit both the relevant companies and their shareholders, because these new systems (i) have distinct functions and roles beyond existing audit systems, (ii) fill gaps commonly existing in the internal controls of companies, and (iii) facilitate the control of management via monitoring and increased transparency. In this thesis, after having reviewed outlines and the pertinent provisions of the compliance control and compliance officer systems introduced by the amended Korean Commercial Code, as well as legislation and the compliance systems in other countries, I will discuss issues and problems associated with the Korean compliance control and compliance officer systems, and also offer recommendations thereon.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0