메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제22권 제4호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
119 - 145 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article studies the reform trend of corporate law not only in germany, but also in korea. The author analysed the reform discussion in germany, especially in the years of 2012. Thereby he has analysed the reform discussion. It includes reverse CB, preferred stock, an action of nullity about general stock holders meeting. He has furthermore handled statues and theories about account modernization, shareholder rights exercise, CEO pay and reform of restructuring law. Above all, it handles with the recent enactment of germany(2009, 2010) and its evaluation. EU commission has also enacted the advice about shareholder rights exercise and the adequate CEO pay(2009). The EU countries should reflect this advice into the national law until determined time. In korea the jurisdiction cases concentrate on ensuring the pay of directors. The discussion about appropriateness of CEO pay will be also important issue in korea in short time. In the process of globalization, the US american law is more important. Germany belongs to continental european law country like korea. Therefore the examples of continental european law country like germany can give korea much more suggestions in the field of enactment. This is true also in case of shareholder rights exercise and adequate CEO pay. In korea there is a trend of establishing remuneration committee. In reality, LG Display and Hynix habe already established and Samsung electronics is planing to establish it. Then the enactment in germany and EU will give us helpful suggestions. The article 388 of korean commercial code should be revised. The directors󰡑 pay should be in adequate relation to their effort and achievement. And the pay should be settled in the valuation of directors󰡑effort and achievement in longer perspective. In regard of convertible bond reform, germany is going to introduce the CB that allows transferring right to company. Until now, by the CB, the transferring right is only allowed to the debenture holder. Germany is going to introduce non-cumulative preferred stock. This is closely related that finance company should have sufficient equity capital. The cumulative preferred stock is not regarded as equity capital. Furthermore, germany is going to introduce relative time limit(one month) for the suit of nullity, in case of abuse of suiting right. Germany is also going to reform the bearer stock system. The company should deposit master policy to banks in case of unlisted company. This is introduced to prevent money laundering. It is necessary to comply with the international demand. The reform trend of corporate law both in germany and korea show some common contents. Germany and korea experience the same movement in regard of the globalization of corporate law. There are also some divergence because of the customs and legal traditions of two countries.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0