It's been more than 90 days since you changed your password. Please change your password to protect your privacy
When you visit DBpia through the library, login to SNS is restricted.
If you visit through the library, the URL will be different and you will not be able to log in to SNS due to kakao/google/naver policy. If you want to use your SNS account, please visit DBpia directly and log in.
The educational philosophy of Article 31 in connection with education-related provisions of the Constitution contains basic interpretation and rational abstraction about sub-laws, society, direction, system, implementation, course, and evaluation of the results in each field. Is this Article 31, there are compulsory education, university education, and lifelong education. But there are lacked of course education in high school and pre-school education.
"Everyone has the right to education equally according to their abilities." In this section 1, the biggest problem according to the education is rised to ranks, when students are educated by "ability", Students' abilities can not be guaranteed in high school and college. Compulsory, gratuitous, common, and basic education require appropriate changes to that section. And then we focus on high school education in particular. In the present study that is required from different direction of course in a different education. Now it is lacked the course education of the high school in Constitution. Basic and fundamental education is the right to education without discrimination in everyone. And deepening, special and professional education should be educated with the modest standards.
In this study, there are based on analysis of education from sub-laws, purpose and philosophy of education, functions of various education systems, developmental stages of learners, characteristics of the courses, and needs of society. Article 31 of the Constitution should be "All citizens in spite of their differences have the right equally to compulsory and gratuitous education." And then, the additional terms and conditions of Section 3 or later should be recommended, "Everyone has the right to education as appropriate standards according to their courses and vocational aptitudes"
추상성, 하위법 제정 및 해석 근거, 사회 각 분야의 기본 방향 지시성을 가진 헌법의교육관련 조항인 제31조는 국가의 교육 이념, 방향, 제도, 실시, 과정, 결과의 평가 및개선 등에서 가장 근본적인 교육가치관을 담고 있다. 여기에는 의무교육, 대학교육, 평생교육에 대한 언명은 있지만, 취학전 교육과 진로별 교육이 이루어져야 할 고교교육에 대한 언명이 결여되어 있다. 또한 ‘능력에 따라’, ‘균등하게’는 형용모순으로서 의무교육도 그 이상의 교육도 제대로 지시하지 못하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 여러 교육관련 하위법의 분석, 교육의 이념과 목적, 각종 교육제도의 기능, 학습자의 발달단계, 배우는 교육과정의 특성, 사회의 요구 등에 기초하여, 헌법 제31조 1항은 초․중학교의무교육에 대해 “모든 국민은 어떠한 차이에도 불구하고 기초․기본교육을 의무․무상으로 균등하게 받을 권리를 가진다.”로, 고교 이후 진로교육에 대해서는 3항 이후 추가 조항으로 “모든 국민은 각 사람의 적성과 진로에 따라 알맞게 교육받을 권리를 가진다.”로 개정될 필요가 있다고 대안을 제안하였다.
You have been reported one after another from other members for writing reviews that contain advertisements, busive language, personal attacks, or disparaging expressions. As a result, you cannot write a review.