메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제49권 제4호
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
1 - 15 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since the Gifted Education Promotion Law was proclaimed in 2001, gifted education has become a catchword among educators and school practitioners. Accordingly, math and science have been selected as two core curricula areas for gifted education. Compared to these core areas, language—especially English—fails to be valued as much. I attribute this to the following two facts. First, the government views verbal giftedness as less contributing to the country’s technological development than the two other areas. Second, it is also attributable to the general belief of educators and school practitioners that language is rarely endemic to giftedness. With respect to institutions for the gifted, there are three representative institutions for gifted education: gifted schools, gifted centers, and gifted classes. Verbally gifted education is, however, offered at the latter two types of institutions. This paper argues that verbally gifted education should be offered mainly in gifted classes for the following two reasons. First, it might be easier to implement regular and continuous language instruction in school classes, enabling more effective language acquisition. Second, offering regular gifted classes during school hours ensures that identified gifted students take only those classes, not both ordinary and gifted ones, consequently challenging the gifted's interest and level of ability.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (10)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0