메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제57권 제4호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
21 - 38 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Although the so-called urbane classical formalism of T. S. Eliot was continued and more developed as an abstract formalism of the New Critics, they were not originated from the same idea. While the New Critics gave emphasis on the individual formal elements and poetic structure itself, Eliot had in mind not so much particular formal qualities as something close to the notion of a genre. He thought of this as “a system of conventions,” which is to be construed as an aesthetic limitation or circle beyond which an artist should not trespass. Eliot kept this notion quintessentially in his poetry and criticism. Accordingly, he criticized the English drama for its unlimited realism and lack of a convention, and insisted “a conventional scheme,” or “form to arrest” not to make it expand and end in the desert of futile realism. He also severely rebuked Matthew Arnold and his neo-Humanist followers for contending that poetry is at bottom a criticism of life and the best poetry supersedes both religion and philosophy. Eliot thought they had confused literary criticism with something else, because, for him, everything in this world or next has a convention of its own.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0