메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제53권 제4호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
383 - 403 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to show that a study of literature has a place within the range of linguistic studies. It is commonly thought that poetic language is beyond ordinary language; that it is something essentially different, special, heigher, with extraordinary tools and techniques like metaphors, an instrument beyond the reach of someone who just talks. The advent of the cognitive linguistics laid foundations for the discussion of metaphor. Lakoff and Johnson(1980) argue that metaphor is deeply pervaded in everyday language, thoughts and behaviors, and not just poetic language. These cognitive linguistics say that metaphor is a way of understanding and experiencing unfamiliar concepts via familiar ones. Metaphor is necessary not only for our imagination but also for our reason. Great poets can speak to us because they use the modes of thought we all possess. I pose a general question of the theory of metaphor; ‘Conceptual Blending Theory(Turner and Fauconnier, 1998)’ and more widely, within the theory of metaphor, I try to examine the metaphoric system of Robert Frost’s poetry. As a result of analyzing Robert Frost’s poetry, “Never Again Would Birds Song Be the Same”, contrary to the general beliefs, a literal study of literary texts is claimed to be highly interrelated with cognitive linguistics.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0