메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제53권 제4호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
297 - 317 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
If kes in the head position of NP has no argument status in its preceding clause, then it undertakes a certain functional role, whereas kes in the head position of NP is a referential head if it is related to a variable or precedent in its preceding clause. In this paper, kes in the HiRC construction is an anaphor, which cannot be distributive. The bare noun like haksayng, which is generic, bears a collective reading, which cannot license the distributivity of its following tul-marked anaphor caki; hence, bare nouns cannot serve as an antecedent of a distributive floating quantifier. This is complementary in that the third person singular can occur with its c-commanding anaphor bearing overlapping reference. The anaphor kes in the sentence is collective, which is what bare nouns show. On the other hand, the distributivity of the tul-marked kes in the HeRC can be reconstructed to the original site in order for the distributor kakkak or a tul-marked adverbial to be licensed. The noun kes can also have a distributive meaning, when the plural marker tul is attached to it. While the reflexive anaphor should be c-commanded by its antecedent, the donkey anaphor is not c-commanded. In this vein, kes in the HiRC and the donkey anaphor have a property in common. However, the two anaphors are different in the sense that while the former bears an exclusive collectivity, the latter can bear a distributivity.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0