지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 동향자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.7
- 수록면
- 1 - 6 (0page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As of October 2018, Korean construction firms have received a total of 98.9 billion U.S. dollars in orders (or 40.9 percent of all orders) within the New Southern region, which includes ASEAN Member States (AMSs). The figure exceeds the 85.7 billion U.S. dollars in orders to the Middle East (35.5 percent of the total), indicating that the New Southern region has become Korea's largest origin of orders. We provide comprehensive information on the ASEAN infrastructure market to policy makers in Korea. In addition, we survey Korean construction firms to evaluate their business environment and performance. Furthermore, we search for lessons to be gained by analyzing the support measures of Japan for its firms in ASEAN infrastructure markets. Based on the results of the previous analysis, we suggest policy implications for policy makers in Korea to provide support for its construction firms actively engaged in the ASEAN infrastructure market. First, given that construction firms from Korea have difficulties in hiring local technical personnel, policy makers could consider expanding the Technology Advice and Solutions from Korea (TASK) program from the manufacturing sector to the construction sector as well to supply adequately trained workers. Second, a support system for Korean construction firms to facilitate their localization is required. Third, the policy makers in Korea could devise and provide customized support for SMEs. Fourth, we need to increase the size of policy funds related to overseas infrastructure markets. Fifth, a system should be established to identify flagship projects for the New Southern Policy. Sixth, policy makers in Korea may help ASEAN to set up technical standards in the infrastructure sector.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Study of New Southward Policy Responsive e-Business Strategy for the ASEAN Market Penetration Expansion
e-비즈니스연구
2018 .10
-
ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community and Policy Implications for Korea
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2020 .08
-
한국과 대만의 對아세안 경제정책 비교
비교경제연구
2019 .01
-
ASEAN-ROK Partnership: What’s next after the New Southern Policy?
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2022 .08
-
The ASEAN Statistical Community and the Role of External Partners
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2018 .08
-
Analysis on 2017 ASEAN-related Summits : focused on ASEAN Plus Three, ASEAN-Korea, EAS
IFANS FOCUS
2017 .12
-
The impact of forward and backward GVC participation on China’s OFDI in ASEAN
동남아시아연구
2021 .08
-
Korea’s ODA to Southeast Asia
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2015 .06
-
2015 ASEAN 관련 정상회의 결과분석: ASEAN, ASEAN+3, EAS를 중심으로
주요국제문제분석
2015 .12
-
2017년 ASEAN 관련 정상회의 결과분석: ASEAN+3, 한-ASEAN, EAS를 중심으로
주요국제문제분석
2017 .12
-
2016년 ASEAN 관련 정상회의 결과분석: ASEAN, ASEAN+3, EAS를 중심으로
주요국제문제분석
2016 .11
-
2018년 ASEAN 관련 정상회의 결과분석 : 한-ASEAN, ASEAN+3, EAS를 중심으로
주요국제문제분석
2018 .12
-
Assessment of 2015 ASEAN Summits: Focusing on ASEAN, ASEAN+3, and EAS
IFANS BRIEF
2015 .12
-
Analysis of 2016 ASEAN-Related Summits: On ASEAN, ASEAN+3, and the EAS
IFANS FOCUS
2016 .10
-
An Analysis of Service Trade Regulation in ASEAN and Its Implications
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2020 .02
-
ASEAN 시장의 강원도 수출경쟁력 분석
관세학회지
2020 .02
-
우리나라 기업의 해외진출을 위한 투자환경과 시사점 - BRIC’s 이후 신흥시장인 ASEAN을 중심으로 -
무역보험연구
2015 .12
-
일본의 대 ASEAN 전략의 변화
21세기정치학회보
2018 .12
-
밀레니얼 세대를 활용한 한-아세안 무역 확대방안
무역상무연구
2020 .08
-
Assessment of the 2018 ASEAN Summit : Takeaways from the Korea-ASEAN, ASEAN+3, and East Asia Summits
IFANS FOCUS
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0