지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.2
- 수록면
- 3 - 21 (19page)
- DOI
- 10.35505/slj.2019.02.8.1.3
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this presentation, we will examine the contents of the regulation of terms and conditions in the Japanese Civil Code.
First, Article 548-2 of the Civil Code stipulates the two requirements for the agreement of terms contracts in a special form. According to the above provision, if a person has agreed to the intent of the contents of formal terms and conditions (subparagraph 1) or if a `formal terms and conditions preparer` has indicated the contractual contents of the contractual terms to the other party in advance (subparagraph 2), it is deemed that the counterparties of the formal terms and conditions reached an agreement to the individual clauses. In addition, pursuant to Article 548-3 (1) of the Civil Code of Japan, it is stipulated that, in the case where the other party makes a request, the preparer of the formal contract must present the contents of the formal contract, and there is no obligation to disclose. About this, from the viewpoint of consumer protection, it is desirable to make the principle of preliminary disclosure of the contents of the agreement and the requirements of the agreement of the counterparty customer in principle, and to revise the deemed provision to the presumed provision. There is criticism that it is necessary to recognize the right of withdrawal and cancellation from the contract according to the amendment of the terms and conditions. In addition, since the "unspecified majority" customers are almost consumers for the "regular transaction", the regulation concerning the formal terms and conditions is often overlapped with the discipline concerning the consumer transaction contract.
Second, Paragraph 2 of Article 548-2 excludes the case of violation of the basic principle of the good faith in the light of the type of regular transaction, its conditions and the social common notion in transaction and unilaterally harming the other party"s profits from the deemed agreement. The above provision stipulates that the binding of the parties to the provisions of the formal contract shall not be construed solely in terms of the contents of the provision, but that the other party shall not be bound by the fact that the other party does not clearly recognize the provision.
First, Article 548-2 of the Civil Code stipulates the two requirements for the agreement of terms contracts in a special form. According to the above provision, if a person has agreed to the intent of the contents of formal terms and conditions (subparagraph 1) or if a `formal terms and conditions preparer` has indicated the contractual contents of the contractual terms to the other party in advance (subparagraph 2), it is deemed that the counterparties of the formal terms and conditions reached an agreement to the individual clauses. In addition, pursuant to Article 548-3 (1) of the Civil Code of Japan, it is stipulated that, in the case where the other party makes a request, the preparer of the formal contract must present the contents of the formal contract, and there is no obligation to disclose. About this, from the viewpoint of consumer protection, it is desirable to make the principle of preliminary disclosure of the contents of the agreement and the requirements of the agreement of the counterparty customer in principle, and to revise the deemed provision to the presumed provision. There is criticism that it is necessary to recognize the right of withdrawal and cancellation from the contract according to the amendment of the terms and conditions. In addition, since the "unspecified majority" customers are almost consumers for the "regular transaction", the regulation concerning the formal terms and conditions is often overlapped with the discipline concerning the consumer transaction contract.
Second, Paragraph 2 of Article 548-2 excludes the case of violation of the basic principle of the good faith in the light of the type of regular transaction, its conditions and the social common notion in transaction and unilaterally harming the other party"s profits from the deemed agreement. The above provision stipulates that the binding of the parties to the provisions of the formal contract shall not be construed solely in terms of the contents of the provision, but that the other party shall not be bound by the fact that the other party does not clearly recognize the provision.
목차
日文槪要
1. 2017年民法改正前の約款規制
2. 改正民法下の約款規制
3. 定型約款における「みなし合意」
4. みなし合意からの除外規定
參考文獻
Abstract
참고문헌 (6)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
莞本≪??通辨≫在中、朝、日的流?
퇴계학논총
2021 .01
-
민법의 제정 과정에 대한 입법평가
법과정책
2018 .01
-
‘2017년 일본 민법 (채권법) 개정에서 약관(‘정형 약관’) 규제 규율’
서강법률논총
2019 .02
-
日本에서의 채권법개정 10년사 : 한국법연구자의 시점과 함께
서강법률논총
2018 .02
-
解析TPP金融服务章节及其对中国的适用性
국제거래와 법
2017 .04
-
中???股???的法律?制小考
동북아법연구
2021 .01
-
일본 민법(채권법) 주요 개정사항 개관 : 민법총칙을 중심으로
비교사법
2017 .08
-
한국민법에 있어서 일본민법의 영향과 역사적 과제 - 서론적 고찰 -
법학논집
2016 .01
-
‘알기 쉬운 민법’ 개정작업의 경과와 주요 내용
법조
2016 .01
-
日本語教育における実践研究の可能性－「台湾の日本語教育における実践研究」－
일본어교육연구
2017 .08
-
傷害保険における事故の外来性について
서강법률논총
2017 .08
-
日本人教師と上級学習者間のグループチャットに見られる韓国語と日本語のコードスイッチング －日本語のハングル表記を中心に－
일본언어문화
2020 .01
-
개정 일본민법에서의 위험부담과 시사점
강원법학
2021 .11
-
日本における相続法の変遷
가족법연구
2016 .07
-
『朝鮮王朝實錄』に見られる日本音漢字表記の 日本語音韻資料としての價値について
일본언어문화
2018 .01
-
典故와 중국의 근대 ― 청말 여행기를 통해 본 새로운 경험의 시적 형상화 문제
중국학보
2020 .01
-
The Institutional Value and Judicial Application of the Defensive Clause in the Company’s Bylaw
원광법학
2019 .01
-
일본에서 배울 점, 배우지 말아야 할 점
월간 KIET 산업경제
2019 .11
-
‘알기 쉬운 민법’ 개정안(재산법 편)에 대한 비판론의 검토
비교사법
2018 .11
-
中国手机购物软件用户协议格式条款的法律规制
국제거래와 법
2023 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-360-000757146