메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
류성희 (단국대학교) 임석필 (단국대학교)
저널정보
한국경영교육학회 한국경영교육학회 학술발표대회논문집 한국경영교육학회 2018년도 추계 학술발표대회논문집
발행연도
2018.11
수록면
350 - 368 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
We study the small and medium sized enterprises’(hereinafter, SMEs) financial policy in Korea.
We focus on which capital structure theory SMEs mainly follow between the pecking order and the tradeoff theories. SMEs’ have different financial policy compared with big ones, as SMEs have different characteristics.
Using the methods of Berger and Udell(2002), Sogorb-Mira(2005) and Shyam-Sunder and Myers(1999), we test the pecking order and tradeoff theories; we find that financial deficits(FD) have a negative association with total debt and short-term debt changes(△TD, △SD) but a positive association with long-term debt change(△LD).
Thus, with having these mixed results, we cannot fully support the pecking order theory.
In addition, we do not find the evidence that firms adjust their capital structures, for all △TD, △SD and △LD when using the coefficients of three different types of leverage deficits(DFT).
However, using dynamic model, we fine the evidence of that SMEs ajust their debt level toward targets. Having these two contradictable results, we cannot affirmingly approve the tradeoff theory either.
However, as mentioned before, our data show that firms continuously reduce their debt levels, during our sample period; this is strong evidence of approval of tradeoff theory.
In addition, our study likewise shows that Korean SMEs use more SD than LD. As firms hold SD and LD with different reasons, this higher SD level is important to remember to interpret regression results, specially during our sample period in which SMEs try to recover from the financial crisis caused by U.S housing bubble.

목차

Summary
I. Introduction
II. Literature reviews
III. Data and methods
VI. Analysing and results
V. Conclusion

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0