지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.96 No.1
- 발행연도
- 2019.1
- 수록면
- 14 - 18 (5page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Laparoscopic major liver resection (major LLR) remains a challenging procedure because of the technical difficulty. Several significant technical innovations have been applied in our center since 2012. They include routine application of bipolar electrocautery, initiation of temporary increase of intra-abdominal pressure during bleeding events from veins to balance the central venous pressure, and use of temporary inflow control of the Glissonean pedicle. This study evaluated the impact of these technique modifications in patients with major LLR.
Methods: Between January 2004 and February 2015, a total of 606 patients underwent LLR at Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Korea. Major LLR was employed in 233 cases. All major LLR procedures were anatomical resections performed with a totally laparoscopic approach. We compared surgical parameters of right hepatectomy (RH), left hepatectomy (LH), and right posterior sectionectomy (RPS) before and after 2012.
Results: Open conversion rates of RH and LH and estimated blood loss in RPS significantly decreased after 2012. The postoperative complication rate of major LLR was 12.7% and was similar before and after 2012. Bile leakage was the most common complication (3.2%).
Conclusion: The modifications of surgical techniques resulted in good outcomes for laparoscopic major LLR. We recommend routine application of these techniques to improve outcomes, especially in patients requiring major liver resection.
Methods: Between January 2004 and February 2015, a total of 606 patients underwent LLR at Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Korea. Major LLR was employed in 233 cases. All major LLR procedures were anatomical resections performed with a totally laparoscopic approach. We compared surgical parameters of right hepatectomy (RH), left hepatectomy (LH), and right posterior sectionectomy (RPS) before and after 2012.
Results: Open conversion rates of RH and LH and estimated blood loss in RPS significantly decreased after 2012. The postoperative complication rate of major LLR was 12.7% and was similar before and after 2012. Bile leakage was the most common complication (3.2%).
Conclusion: The modifications of surgical techniques resulted in good outcomes for laparoscopic major LLR. We recommend routine application of these techniques to improve outcomes, especially in patients requiring major liver resection.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity case-matched analysis of the long-term survival
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .02
-
Early experience of laparoscopic liver resection: A single institution experience with 37 consecutive cases
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2019 .05
-
Long-Term Surgical Outcomes in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection: A Retrospective and Propensity Score-Matched Study
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
-
Operative and Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Obese Patients
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
-
Recent Indication of LLR for HCC
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Realization of improved outcomes following liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma patients aged 75 years and older
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2021 .11
-
Surgical techniques of laparoscopic repeat liver resection
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Robotic major liver resections: Surgical outcomes compared with open major liver resections
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .02
-
Outcome of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Patients with Old Age
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Long term outcome and surgical result of laparoscopic liver resection for HCC (<5cm) compared to open liver resection
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2016 .04
-
The learning curve of the laparoscopic liver resection according to the previous surgical experience
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Development of Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Korea
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2018 .02
-
The comparison of the learning curve between laparoscopic major and minor liver resection
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2015 .09
-
Surgical Strategy to Prevent Near-misses during Laparoscopic Liver Resection
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Comparative study of Laparoscopic Liver Resection and Open Liver Resection in Patients over 70 years of age.
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Laparoscopic S1 resection
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
Laparoscopic Repeat Liver Resection; Short-term Outcomes
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2019 .02
-
Laparoscopic resection for a difficult liver segment (1,7 & 8): technical strategies
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Single Port Laparoscopic Liver Resection
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
What Kind of Energy Device Do You Choose during Laparoscopic Liver Resection
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-514-000442253