지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.12
- 수록면
- 119 - 144 (26page)
- DOI
- 10.46834/jkmcah.2018.12.36.119
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After 30 years has passed since the 1988 Seoul Olympics, nowadays Olympic Park and Olympic Sculpture Park are indistinguishable to the nearby residents. At the point where publicity and individual freedom merges, everything around becomes privatized. Where even nature such as mountains and rivers, sunrises and sunset occupies space, Korean society is driven by extreme capitalism and therefore, Olympic Sculpture Park can be just seen as a ‘garden’. This is a reflection of the Korean society that has reached extreme capitalism and an aftereffect of an event that has been pushed by public power that desired oblivion. Even though the evaluation of a memorial monument that has to be remembered publicly changes over time, it is located in the society as a scene of history. This is a different way from environmental sculptures on the premise of beautiful urban landscape. If the sculptures in the Olympic Sculpture Park only rely on the history, which means that if they don’t become art pieces in connection with life, and don’t be evaluated as an artistic sculpture park, it will always encounter with personal freedom that has been experienced by Cesar’s 〈Thumb〉.
The art pieces at Olympic Sculpture Park were created even by the Cold War Era Eastern European artists. Though these art works, the park could become a location that symbolizes peace and harmony beyond ideology, and even by satisfying the desire of internationality. However, the generation who remembers the Cold War Era is no longer the ones who raise their children and strolling in the park. In addition, the artistic evaluation of the works displayed in the ‘Sculpture Exhibition Park’ are changing and have rapidly lost their aura in national events. Beyond the title of the world’s first Olympic sculpture park or a large scale sculpture park, and being beyond the ‘Sculptures in Olympic Park’ and becoming the main subject is not the necessarily figure that the modern society aims. The starting point of building the Olympic Sculpture Park that has been filled with art works was hinged on the creation of a competitive space of expression that gets abreast of the event of competitive sports matches that is based on nationalism.
The artistic works of the Olympic Park are still part of the world art. The fact that the world-renowned work in in the Olympic Park proves that we have joined the world’s level of the time. The Olympic Sculpture Park is located within the Olympic Park, which is represented by common memories in a public place. As social existences seem to be inevitably changed as time passes by, the public art that were location focused has changed to community characteristic art starting from the issues. Thus, Olympic Park and Olympic Sculpture Park have now become a point where the desire of admitting the place as a proof of globalization and where the environmental sculptures that are located in a personal experienced space conflicts. In the world where the awareness of Olympics is changing, the Olympic Sculpture Park is located at the point where the desire of private gardens and public parks meets.
The art pieces at Olympic Sculpture Park were created even by the Cold War Era Eastern European artists. Though these art works, the park could become a location that symbolizes peace and harmony beyond ideology, and even by satisfying the desire of internationality. However, the generation who remembers the Cold War Era is no longer the ones who raise their children and strolling in the park. In addition, the artistic evaluation of the works displayed in the ‘Sculpture Exhibition Park’ are changing and have rapidly lost their aura in national events. Beyond the title of the world’s first Olympic sculpture park or a large scale sculpture park, and being beyond the ‘Sculptures in Olympic Park’ and becoming the main subject is not the necessarily figure that the modern society aims. The starting point of building the Olympic Sculpture Park that has been filled with art works was hinged on the creation of a competitive space of expression that gets abreast of the event of competitive sports matches that is based on nationalism.
The artistic works of the Olympic Park are still part of the world art. The fact that the world-renowned work in in the Olympic Park proves that we have joined the world’s level of the time. The Olympic Sculpture Park is located within the Olympic Park, which is represented by common memories in a public place. As social existences seem to be inevitably changed as time passes by, the public art that were location focused has changed to community characteristic art starting from the issues. Thus, Olympic Park and Olympic Sculpture Park have now become a point where the desire of admitting the place as a proof of globalization and where the environmental sculptures that are located in a personal experienced space conflicts. In the world where the awareness of Olympics is changing, the Olympic Sculpture Park is located at the point where the desire of private gardens and public parks meets.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 문화올림픽과 올림픽조각공원
Ⅲ. 올림픽조각공원의 조각과 기념물
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Sculpture
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2023 .02
-
한국 현대조각 연구사
미술사논단
2020 .06
-
Wallbreaker - Expanding Research on Sculpture Ontology in the Intelligent Era
동양예술
2021 .01
-
Colors of the Public Art in Urban, Based on Seoul’s Sculpture
AIC 2017 Jeju
2017 .10
-
충북지역 조각 공원 및 작품의 보존 현황과 관리 방안에 대한 연구
기초조형학연구
2019 .10
-
이승택의 (비)조각 연구: 『세계여체조각』을 중심으로
현대미술사연구
2021 .06
-
조각의 장소성에 따른 장소의 작품화 연구 : 1960년대 미니멀리즘 조각의 장소성과 조각, 장소, 관객의 관계를 중심으로
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2016 .10
-
관광 활성화를 위한 도시 환경조형물 평가에 관한 연구 -해안도시 사례를 중심으로-
한국공간디자인학회 논문집
2024 .02
-
Y Park
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2023 .06
-
Color, the 5th dimension in sculpture
한국색채학회 학술대회
2020 .05
-
Scenery Sculpture
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2020 .12
-
조각의 확장과 비조각의 의미 - ‘부정성(negativity)’으로 존재하는 조각 -
예술과 미디어
2020 .01
-
1965-1972년까지 문신 추상 조각의 전개와 구조 분석
한국근현대미술사학
2019 .07
-
빅데이터를 활용한 올림픽 담론분석
한국체육과학회지
2024 .08
-
동시대 인체 조각에서 나타나는 재현 방식에 관한 연구 -데이비드 알트메이드와 올리버 라릭의 작업을 중심으로-
기초조형학연구
2023 .04
-
중국 근대 ‘공민(公民)’과 조소 : 기념 및 선전조각을 중심으로
미술사논단
2020 .12
-
설치미술의 국제화 흐름 속 1980-1990년대 한국현대조각의 변화
한국근현대미술사학
2018 .12
-
Volunteering at the Olympic and Youth Olympic Games: More Than a Distant Memory?
Journal of Global Sport Management
2023 .03
-
국민체육진흥공단 올림픽 가치 확산 방안 탐색
한국체육정책학회지
2021 .11
-
한국 최초의 올림픽 참가 과정 연구: 국내 단체결성 및 활동을 중심으로
한국체육사학회지
2022 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한국근현대조각연구사: 2000년대 이후 한국 조각연구의 중심과 변두리
조은정
인물미술사학
2020
.12
중국 아편전쟁박물관의 전시콘텐츠와 역할
오일환
,
김준혁
인문콘텐츠
2015
.09
시설 이전적지 공원화 사업의 공간 재해석 유형 연구
강효정
한국도시설계학회지 도시설계
2014
.08
디지털박물관 전시콘텐츠 스토리텔링 연구 : 전통문화콘텐츠박물관 전시콘텐츠 분석 사례를 중심으로
박재영
인문콘텐츠
2014
.06
한국미술사의 큰 줄기를 잡아내다 : 『유홍준의 한국미술사 강의 1』, 눌와 2010
조인수
창작과비평
2010
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-605-000326907