지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제183집
- 발행연도
- 2018.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 35 (35page)
- DOI
- 10.31791/JKH.2018.12.183.1
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recently, the term ‘humanities’ has been used as a fashion in Korean society. The so - called ‘humanism frenzy’ is not a government – led, but is one of social phenomenon. Rather, the government is reducing support for humanities, and the lives of humanities researchers are becoming more and more depressed. Moreover, the socioeconomic conditions of those who study humanities are already at the bottom. Even if we look at the employment rates of graduate students in humanities and the employment patterns of doctoral students, it is easy to find out the problem is serious. It is very difficult to find a job unless it is in the form of a college professor or research professor. The government opens up just little employment opportunity to graduates of humanities.
Socially, humanities are called ‘hot winds’, but the lives of humanities researchers are getting tougher. What happens? There are several reasons in structure; Universities becomes industrialized, jobs are reduced in universities, governmental humanities policies without realistic support, and so-called ‘Korean Research Foundation System’ takes control academic societies with research fee. There are many reasons why humanities researchers are in crisis. Young researchers who are faced on the crisis need to more focus on how sell the history to public.
Perhaps the craze of humanities may be giving opportunities to humanities researchers. Despite the limitations of current craze, we should pay attention to the fact that the public is interested in humanities. Among them, interest in history, especially Korean history is getting bigger. That is why people can easily finds contents related to Korean history in social media space, YouTube and Podcast. The popular ‘knowledge retailers’ such as Yoo Si-min and Sul-Min-suk are already actively advancing into social media and circulating their historical knowledge.
The problem is that historians tried only publish books to make popular. However, it is hard to say that the strategy is effective at this point. Books already published by researchers in the publishing market have lost their popularity. In the present system, the most realistic method to history researchers to make history popularization is as follows. ① Entering into the social media market ② Printing and publishing the results of broadcast ③ Building and circulating a book-centered lecture (citizen lecture, university lecture etc.). Podcast and public book by Man-in-man-saek are good case of these.
Despite the efforts of researchers, it is hard to say that the results produced by the researchers have led to great results. Income, the most crucial thing, is not guaranteed. This “creation of a virtuous circle structure”, which mentioned the starting point of this article, has now begun. Some researchers are investing precious time for that. Social media is a new ecosystem outside the university where historians should live. Researchers should realize that they need to create a totally different research environment in the new ecosystem.
Socially, humanities are called ‘hot winds’, but the lives of humanities researchers are getting tougher. What happens? There are several reasons in structure; Universities becomes industrialized, jobs are reduced in universities, governmental humanities policies without realistic support, and so-called ‘Korean Research Foundation System’ takes control academic societies with research fee. There are many reasons why humanities researchers are in crisis. Young researchers who are faced on the crisis need to more focus on how sell the history to public.
Perhaps the craze of humanities may be giving opportunities to humanities researchers. Despite the limitations of current craze, we should pay attention to the fact that the public is interested in humanities. Among them, interest in history, especially Korean history is getting bigger. That is why people can easily finds contents related to Korean history in social media space, YouTube and Podcast. The popular ‘knowledge retailers’ such as Yoo Si-min and Sul-Min-suk are already actively advancing into social media and circulating their historical knowledge.
The problem is that historians tried only publish books to make popular. However, it is hard to say that the strategy is effective at this point. Books already published by researchers in the publishing market have lost their popularity. In the present system, the most realistic method to history researchers to make history popularization is as follows. ① Entering into the social media market ② Printing and publishing the results of broadcast ③ Building and circulating a book-centered lecture (citizen lecture, university lecture etc.). Podcast and public book by Man-in-man-saek are good case of these.
Despite the efforts of researchers, it is hard to say that the results produced by the researchers have led to great results. Income, the most crucial thing, is not guaranteed. This “creation of a virtuous circle structure”, which mentioned the starting point of this article, has now begun. Some researchers are investing precious time for that. Social media is a new ecosystem outside the university where historians should live. Researchers should realize that they need to create a totally different research environment in the new ecosystem.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며 - 인문학 열풍과 연구자의 현실
Ⅱ. 소셜 미디어 속 대중역사의 범람과 한계
Ⅲ. 역사연구자는 지금(까지) 무엇을 팔고 있나?
Ⅳ. 생존을 위한 역사‘학’, 어떻게 팔 것인가?
Ⅴ. 나가며 - ‘올바른’ 역사 대중화?
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Humanities in the General Education of Korean Universities
언어학 연구
2016 .10
-
`철학함`으로서 인문학 : 총체적 학문으로서의 인문학을 위한 단초
인문연구
2016 .04
-
일본 대학의 동양고전 관련 디지털 인문학 교육 현황
대동한문학(大東漢文學)
2021 .12
-
시대적 사명과 인문학의 역할
동아인문학
2021 .03
-
한국에서의 레트로(Retro) 인문학 연구의 가능성 시론(試論)
철학∙사상∙문화
2020 .01
-
인문학의 대중화 방안 -아산시 지역을 대상으로
순천향 인문과학논총
2017 .12
-
인문공학론(2)지식구조화와 하이퍼텍스트
한국언어문학
2016 .01
-
한국에서의 한중 인문학의 교육과 발전
한중인문학연구
2016 .01
-
디지털 시대에 인문학의 변화 가능성 모색
용봉인문논총
2016 .01
-
디지털 인문학과 고문헌 자료 연구
열상고전연구
2016 .04
-
빅 데이터 시대의 디지털 인문학
민족문화연구
2016 .01
-
디지털인문학, 인문학의 창발적 변화인가?
현대유럽철학연구
2015 .01
-
4차산업혁명 시대 人文學의 展望 － ‘材’와 ‘不材’의 사이 －
한중언어문화연구
2018 .01
-
러시아 인문과학의 융복합적 사유 (II) - 기호-공백의 ‘화이트홀’과 테크노-휴머니즘
외국학연구
2020 .01
-
생태인문학을 활용한 자기서사 치유 및 평생교육의 가능성 -실버 인문학 강독모임을 중심으로-
문학치료연구
2017 .01
-
국내 디지털인문학 정책 수립을 위한 제언
인문콘텐츠
2018 .12
-
4차 산업혁명 시대의 인문학 기반 대학 교양교육 지식체계에 대한 성찰적 고찰
인문과학연구
2020 .01
-
Character Education and Humanities Therapy : Humanities Therapy as a Prevention against Social and Relationship Problems
Journal of Humanities Therapy
2018 .12
-
농촌에서 진행한 인문학 프로그램의 효용성에 대한 고찰
인문논총
2021 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0