메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
역사문화연구소 역사문화논총 역사문화논총 제8호
발행연도
2014.8
수록면
35 - 70 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the East Asian situations that were in disturbance from the late 16th century, Japan and Jurchen had threatened the existence of Joseon. Under these circumstances, Joseon chose to adopt a confrontation strategy of reception of Japan and defense against Jurchen. However, the strong power of Ching and the diplomatic provocation of Japan demanded changes in this strategy.
Oaejeong Jamun was a diplomatic measure of reporting Japanese situations to Ching. This is a quite interesting historical material to see how Joseon royal court set the multilateral relations of dynamics and took diplomatic countermeasures, through reviewing its sending intention and its contents. Until the age of King Injo, Oaejeong Jamun was conducted based on King Injo’s doctrine of preparation against Japan. In other words, he attempted to form strategic bond of sympathy between Joseon and Ching through the reports related to Japan. Afterwards, he obtained a certain degree of outcomes of resolving the situations of Joseon which had restrictions in the expansion of armaments
However, after King Hyojong’s accession to the throne, Oaejeong Jamun based on the doctrine of preparation against Japan could not obtain outcomes. It can be seen that this was because of restraining Ching due to the collapse of pro-Ching power and the expansion of anti-Ching atmosphere. And mitigation of wariness against Japan after Ching’s occupation of China can be said to be another reason for this.
Thus, Oaejeong Jamun was a product of setting the East Asian dynamics composition and the strategic pursuit. And it can be confirmed that the general theory that Joseon maintained the peaceful relation with Japan to cope with changes in the state of things in the northern regions is applicable to very limited periods.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 병자호란 이후 동아시아 역학구도 상정
Ⅲ. 왜정자문을 통한 대청(對淸) 비왜론(備倭論)의 전개
Ⅳ. 대내외적 여건 변화와 비왜론의 한계 노정
Ⅴ. 맺음말
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-002995750