메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정인우 (인하대학교) 이익모 (인하대학교) 황용우 (인하대학교) 김영운 (인하대학교)
저널정보
한국위험물학회 한국위험물학회지 한국위험물학회지 제6권 제1호
발행연도
2018.6
수록면
142 - 150 (9page)
DOI
10.31333/kihm.2018.6.1.142

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to find the system that can be introduced in Korea in order to minimize damage in case of chemical accidents from the result of reviewing the chemical management systems of the US and EU. The Korean Chemical Management Act, the US Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act, and the EU Seveso Directive are the scope of the study. We proposed five systems that can be introduced in Korea. First, the Korean Chemical Substance Management Act does not have local participations. This is because we don"t have local emergency response systems. Therefore, Korea local emergency response systems such as SERC and LEPC in the US should be installed. Second, the Korean local emergency response system, have to make an emergency response plan as well as an emergency response plan for each workplace established in the risk management plan. Third, it is possible to minimize the damage caused by chemical accidents by reporting to the Korea local emergency response system. Fourth, in the European Seveso Directive, they regulate large-scale workplace more effectively than small- and medium-sized ones by regulating the scale of harmful substances. We can introduce similar way so we can regulate more effectively. Fifth, we have to make a way that can collect opinions of residents (public) when we make a local emergency plan. Also, in this paper, we checked the law of city A and city B to find out our five proposed systems are exist or not and examined the differences between them and the foreign system. In addition, set three and ten years" time to suggested what kind of system should be introduced first in each period in establishing the Korean emergency response system. The first step is to establish an emergency response plan for each industrial complex through six chemical disaster prevention centers (Yeosu, Siheung, Seosan, Ulsan, Iksan, and Gumi) during the current operation. In my opinion, it is right to establish an emergency response plan for an industrial complex (area) in the environmental team under the Ministry of Environment, which is the executor of the Chemical Substance Control Act. The second step is installing a regional branch office. In this branch, I believe it is right not only to plan for the regional emergency response system but also to respond to the occurrence of a chemical accident. And public involvement in establishing a regional emergency response plan at the installed branch in the third order. The fourth step is to expand the scope of the notification to the branch office where the chemical accident occurred. The final order is the separate management of the handling of chemicals over the reference quantity.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 국내 화학물질관리법과 외국 법령 비교
Ⅲ. 우선도입대상항목 선정 및 지방 조례 검토
Ⅳ . 한국형 긴급대응체계 제안
Ⅴ. 결론
References

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0