메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영교육학회 경영교육연구 경영교육논총 제26집
발행연도
2002.6
수록면
1 - 13 (13page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The core of the effective external audit function is built around the auditor independence. However, the recent financial fraud related to Enron has raised the great skepticism on the auditor independence and management advisory services (MAS) provided by the external auditor. This study attempts to examine the effect of MAS provided by the external auditor on the auditor independence based on public disclosures in the annual reports of the listed firms. Specifically, this study investigates whether there is any difference in audit fees and MAS fees between firms with MAS or qualified audit opinions by using the disclosures about audit fees, MAS fees, and audit opinions. Briefly, this study finds that the size controlled audit fee does not show any difference regardless of MAS provided by the external auditor. This finding is consistent with previous studies which did not report any audit fee discount under the presence of MAS. On addition, audit fee and MAS fee do not show any statistically significant difference regardless of audit opinions and opinion changes. However, these results do not imply that MAS are totally irrelevant to auditor independence since public disclosures exclude MAS provided by consulting firms which are affiliates of external auditors. Therefore, public disclosures on MAS should be strengthened to include those firms and further in-depth studies are required to resolve this issue.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-032-002184946