지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study intends to discover and appreciate multiple modernities by comparing Incheon (仁川) in Korea and Dalian (大連) in China. Both cities were open ports under the rule of Japanese imperialism and, according to the ruler’s urban planning, were built dually to separate the residences of the colonizer and the colonized. The borderlines that were drawn to divide different ethnicities, soon became socio-economic borderlines. As the cities kept developing, the social gaps between the separated residences became obvious. Since 1990s, both in Incheon and Dalian, efforts have been made to reflect their own histories as open ports and it turns out that the socio-economic borderlines from the past still remain unchanged.
While present literature frequently deals with the dual structure of Incheon or Dalian or focuses on how to preserve specific modern historical places in the cities, this study explores the possibilities of restoring modernity from within as well as from outside by properly preserving and utilizing the remaining duel places. Both located near to the open ports, Baedari in Incheon and Xiaogangzi (小崗子) in Dalian were residences of low-income people who were providing manpower for each colonized society. These two areas are meaningful in that they not only accepted the influence from outside also developed autonomous modernity by maintaining national identity and internal motivation. However, the reality is that at present, they are just old and rundown areas which are almost forgotten, waiting to be redeveloped. With the rise of consciousness about the significance of modern history, more people tend to prefer restoration to removal of historical places. Still it requires more judicious approaches to restoring local history. Approaching the unvarnished history in specific and elaborated ways will make the meaning of modernity in the colonized cities richer and deeper. We should be careful that the recent new interest in the histories of the two cities doesn’t end in degenerating those historical sites, such as Baedari and Xiaogangzi, into commercialized nostalgic areas or in creating extra burden by failing to incorporate the renewed historical sites into the original local communities.
While present literature frequently deals with the dual structure of Incheon or Dalian or focuses on how to preserve specific modern historical places in the cities, this study explores the possibilities of restoring modernity from within as well as from outside by properly preserving and utilizing the remaining duel places. Both located near to the open ports, Baedari in Incheon and Xiaogangzi (小崗子) in Dalian were residences of low-income people who were providing manpower for each colonized society. These two areas are meaningful in that they not only accepted the influence from outside also developed autonomous modernity by maintaining national identity and internal motivation. However, the reality is that at present, they are just old and rundown areas which are almost forgotten, waiting to be redeveloped. With the rise of consciousness about the significance of modern history, more people tend to prefer restoration to removal of historical places. Still it requires more judicious approaches to restoring local history. Approaching the unvarnished history in specific and elaborated ways will make the meaning of modernity in the colonized cities richer and deeper. We should be careful that the recent new interest in the histories of the two cities doesn’t end in degenerating those historical sites, such as Baedari and Xiaogangzi, into commercialized nostalgic areas or in creating extra burden by failing to incorporate the renewed historical sites into the original local communities.
목차
1. 들어가며
2. 개항도시의 이중도시 양상 - 인천과 다롄
3. ‘개항장 주변’의 변화와 문제
4. 나가며
〈參考文獻〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
김규동 초기시의 특성과 그 의미
비평문학
2018 .06
-
NegotiaModernity: Elegant Gathering by Go Huidongting
열상고전연구
2016 .08
-
보편제국, 근대의 초극 혹은 귀환: 알렉산드르 두긴과 유라시아 지정학
슬라브학보
2023 .12
-
역사적 개념으로서의 노스탤지어 - ‘응답하라’에서 혁명의 소비까지
역사비평
2020 .11
-
Returning to the Ruins: Transnational Nostalgia in Paul Yoon’s The Mountain
영어영문학
2021 .09
-
일리야 카바코프 창작에 반영된 소비에트 아이러니와 노스탤지어 서사 충동
슬라브학보
2022 .09
-
디지털 기억과 바쿠의 <마할라 프로젝트>: 노스탤지어와 스펙타클을 넘어
슬라브학보
2023 .12
-
The Pursuit of Korean Revolution of Modernity
Journal of Contemporary Korean Studies
2016 .08
-
조향 시문학의 근대성과 탈근대성
우리문학연구
2017 .10
-
Exploring the Meaning of Double Nostalgia in the Life Histories of Sakhalin Koreans
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2020 .12
-
Wordsworth and Modernity
18세기영문학
2017 .01
-
서울의 젠트리피케이션과 도시 재생 혹은 개발주의 이후 도시 공간의 모순과 경합
사이間SAI
2015 .11
-
위험사회 속에서 유동하는 현대인의 불안의식과 노스탤지어 : 『숨 쉬러 나오다』를 중심으로
신영어영문학
2017 .08
-
재외국민의 향수와 고향의 의미 : 중국 선양(瀋陽), 단둥(丹東) 지역을 중심으로
지방사와 지방문화
2016 .05
-
동학농민전쟁에 대한 새로운 이해와 내재적 접근
역사비평
2015 .02
-
향수의 민족학― 1930~1940년대 동경 간행 한글 시집 연구 2 ―
현대문학이론연구
2015 .01
-
Bittersweet Nostalgia: Objects and Animals in Thomas Hardy’s Middle Period Poetry
영어영문학연구
2023 .02
-
동아시아 젠트리피케이션의 로컬화 : 네 도시의 대안적 어바니즘과 차이의 생산
로컬리티 인문학
2016 .10
-
근대성의 판타지아 — 1990년대 한국문학의 근대성 담론 —
개념과 소통
2020 .01
-
Superior Donuts : Digestive Resistance To Gentrification
Localities
2017 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-910-001776452