지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.12
- 수록면
- 23 - 54 (32page)
- DOI
- 10.15235/jir.2017.12.20.2.23
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study intends to explain which city generally demonstrated the strongest pro-opposition party dispositions in South Korea in the 1950s. To analyze pro-opposition party inclinations in such large cities as Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Incheon, Daejeon, Gwangju, and Jeonju, it comparatively decides ranking in the percentage of votes that the opposition party candidates obtained in the presidential and vice presidential elections and in the number of parliamentary seats that the opposition parties won in the National Assembly elections. As a result, this study confirms that in the 1950s Daegu was the number one pro-opposition party city in South Korea. Among the large cities, Daegu showed the strongest pro-opposition party inclinations in the 1954 National Assembly election, the 1956 presidential and vice presidential elections, and the 1960 vice presidential election. In the elections, Deagu strongly demonstrated its anti-Syngman Rhee and anti-Liberal Party dispositions, which were greatly influenced by the following facts: in 1954, the constitutional amendments for direct presidential election; in 1956, the constitutional amendments abolishing two-term limitations on the presidency; and in 1960, Liberal Party"s heavy vote rigging and the democratization movement staged on 28 February 1960. Daegu also displayed its strong, if not number one, pro-opposition party propensities in the 1952 presidential and vice presidential elections, the 1958 National Assembly election, and the 1960 presidential election.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 국회의원선거, 대통령선거, 부통령선거의 각 선거에서 주요 도시의 야당 성향 순위
Ⅲ. 국회의원선거, 대통령선거, 부통령선거에서 전반적으로 강한 야당 성향을 가진 전국 제1의 도시는?
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (49)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Results and Implications: The 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
IFANS FOCUS
2016 .11
-
한국 시민의 좌파 권위주의 성향과 우파 권위주의 성향 비교: 얼마나 강하고 어떻게 다른가?
한국정당학회보
2023 .03
-
The 2016 US Presidential Election Outcome and Its Implications
IFANS FOCUS
2016 .11
-
COVID-19 Crisis and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
IFANS FOCUS
2020 .05
-
Outlook for the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election and Implications
IFANS FOCUS
2019 .12
-
The 2020 U.S. Elections: A Mixed Result for the Political Parties
The Korean Journal of Policy Studies
2021 .01
-
Prospects for North Korea-U.S. Relations after the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
IFANS FOCUS
2020 .10
-
The Impact of Brexit on the U.S. Presidential Election and its Implications for South Korea
IFANS FOCUS
2016 .07
-
지역투표현상은 퇴조 하는가 : 18대 대통령선거를 중심으로
현대정치연구
2015 .10
-
당파적 양극화의 비정치적 효과
한국정치학회보
2020 .12
-
Voting in a Pandemic: Lessons From the 2020 South Korean Legislative Election
International Economic Journal
2022 .09
-
1956년 제3대 대통령 선거광고 분석 : 각 정당과 후보의 선거전략과 쟁점
정치커뮤니케이션연구
2020 .01
-
The Role of Timing and Presidential Popularity in Local Elections: Upheaval in the 2018 Busan City Council Election
분석과 대안
2022 .03
-
소셜미디어를 이용한 당원들의 온라인 정치참여 행태 분석: 21대 총선을 중심으로
미래정치연구
2021 .06
-
빅데이터 활용 선거 기사의 특성과 문제점 : 주요 한국 언론의 19대 대선 보도분석을 중심으로
사이버커뮤니케이션학보
2018 .06
-
19대 대통령 선거 주요 후보의 10대 공약 및 보건의료 공약
보건행정학회지
2017 .01
-
The Impact of Brexit on U.S. Presidential Election and Foreign Policy
IFANS FOCUS
2016 .08
-
부동층과 이동 투표자의 특성과 투표 선택
미래정치연구
2022 .06
-
The Implications of the 2021 Iranian Presidential Election Results and Outlook
IFANS FOCUS
2021 .07
-
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FAILED ELECTION IN 1993 FOR NIGERIA’S DEMOCRATIC DEVELOPMENT
Asian Journal of African Studies
2017 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-349-001666616