메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정순복 (광주대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제26권 제6호 (인문사회과학 편)
발행연도
2017.12
수록면
165 - 177 (13page)
DOI
10.35159/kjss.2017.12.26.6.165

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper leaded to the conclusion as followings by using Q-method, one of research methods, applied to the analysis of the curriculum needful for guaranteeing their learning right and for enhancing their learning.
First, a total of three types appeared as a result of analyzing the curriculum needful for guaranteeing their learning right and for enhancing their learning through their points of view that the university students majoring in sports had.
Second, three classified types were named, ‘preference for major subjects and non-preference for culture subjects’, ‘preference for major subjects and non-preference for major subjects and culture subjects’, and ‘preference and non-preference for major subjects and culture subjects’. The subjects had differences in the points that the university students, classified with the types, thought to be needful for guaranteeing learning right and enhancing learning.
Third, as a result of analyzing common features among three types, the students thought to be positive major subjects such as ‘sports & ethics’, ‘elderly sports’, ‘health management’, ‘exercise physiology’, and ‘sports & law’, and they thought to be negative culture subjects such as ‘foundation & employment’, ‘foreign languages such as Chinese and Japanese’, and ‘presentation method’.
The common points suggested from three types were the curriculum needful for guaranteeing learning right and enhancing learning of the university students majoring in sports, not subjects in detail. In other words, the students didn"t think a certain subject to be needful. They wanted to participate positively in major subjects, rather than in culture subjects. They as well as general students thought understanding to be insufficient.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 결론 및 논의
참고문헌

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-692-001724380