지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.12
- 수록면
- 570 - 582 (13page)
- DOI
- 10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.6.570
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In recent years, national and local government’s air quality management and climate change adaptation policy has been significantly strengthened. The measures in the two policies may be in a relationship of trade-off or synergy to each other. Greenhouse gases and air pollutants are mostly emitted from the same sources of using considerable amounts of fossil fuels. Co-benefits, in which either measure has a positive effect on the other, may be maximized by reducing the social costs and by consolidating the objectives of the various policies.
In this study, the co-benefits were examined by empirically analyzing the effects of air pollutants and greenhouse gas emission reduction, social cost, and cost effectiveness between the two policies. Of the total 80 projects, the next 12 projects generated co-benefits. They are 1) extend restriction area of solid fuel use, 2) expand subsidy of low-NO<SUB>x</SUB> burner, 3) supply hybrid-vehicles, 4) supply electric-vehicles, 5) supply hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, 6) engine retrofit, 7) scrappage of old car, 8) low emission zone, 9) transportation demand management, 10) supply land-based electric of ship, 11) switching anthracite to clean fuel in private sector, 12) expand regional combinedenergy supply.
The benefits of air pollutants and greenhouse gas-related measures were an annual average of KRW 2,705.4 billion. The social benefits of the transportation demand management were the highest at an annual average of KRW 890.7 billion, and followed by scrappage of old cars and expand regional combined-energy supply. When the social benefits and the annual investment budgets are compared, the cost effectiveness ratio is estimated to be about 3.8.
Overall, the reduction of air pollutants caused by the air quality management policy of Gyeonggi-do resulted in an annual average of KRW 4,790.2 billion. In the point sources management sector, the added value of CO₂ reduction increased by 4.8% to KRW 1,062.8 billion, while the mobile sources management sector increased by 3.6% to KRW 3,414.1 billion. If social benefits from CO₂ reduction are added, the annual average will increase by 7.2% to KRW 5,135.4 billion. The urban and energy management sectors have shown that social benefits increase more than twice as much as the benefits of CO₂ reduction. This result implies that more intensive promotion of these measures are needed.
This study has significance in that it presents the results of the empirical analysis of the co-benefits generated between the similar policies in the air quality management and the climate change policy which are currently being promoted in Gyeonggi-do. This study suggested that the method of analyzing the policy effect among the main policies in the climate atmospheric policy is established and the effectiveness and priority of the major policies can be evaluated through the policy correlation analysis based on the co-benefits. It is expected that it could be a basis for evaluation the efficiency of the climate change adaptation and air quality management policies implemented by the national and local governments in the future.
In this study, the co-benefits were examined by empirically analyzing the effects of air pollutants and greenhouse gas emission reduction, social cost, and cost effectiveness between the two policies. Of the total 80 projects, the next 12 projects generated co-benefits. They are 1) extend restriction area of solid fuel use, 2) expand subsidy of low-NO<SUB>x</SUB> burner, 3) supply hybrid-vehicles, 4) supply electric-vehicles, 5) supply hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, 6) engine retrofit, 7) scrappage of old car, 8) low emission zone, 9) transportation demand management, 10) supply land-based electric of ship, 11) switching anthracite to clean fuel in private sector, 12) expand regional combinedenergy supply.
The benefits of air pollutants and greenhouse gas-related measures were an annual average of KRW 2,705.4 billion. The social benefits of the transportation demand management were the highest at an annual average of KRW 890.7 billion, and followed by scrappage of old cars and expand regional combined-energy supply. When the social benefits and the annual investment budgets are compared, the cost effectiveness ratio is estimated to be about 3.8.
Overall, the reduction of air pollutants caused by the air quality management policy of Gyeonggi-do resulted in an annual average of KRW 4,790.2 billion. In the point sources management sector, the added value of CO₂ reduction increased by 4.8% to KRW 1,062.8 billion, while the mobile sources management sector increased by 3.6% to KRW 3,414.1 billion. If social benefits from CO₂ reduction are added, the annual average will increase by 7.2% to KRW 5,135.4 billion. The urban and energy management sectors have shown that social benefits increase more than twice as much as the benefits of CO₂ reduction. This result implies that more intensive promotion of these measures are needed.
This study has significance in that it presents the results of the empirical analysis of the co-benefits generated between the similar policies in the air quality management and the climate change policy which are currently being promoted in Gyeonggi-do. This study suggested that the method of analyzing the policy effect among the main policies in the climate atmospheric policy is established and the effectiveness and priority of the major policies can be evaluated through the policy correlation analysis based on the co-benefits. It is expected that it could be a basis for evaluation the efficiency of the climate change adaptation and air quality management policies implemented by the national and local governments in the future.
목차
Abstract
1. 서론
2. 대기오염저감 정책 및 기후변화 대응 정책 개요
3. 사업별 대기오염물질 및 온실가스 저감 효과 분석
4. 공편익 분석결과
5. 결론
References
참고문헌 (20)
참고문헌 신청
Gyeonggi-do (2010) A master plan for climate change adaptation in Gyeonggi-do.
Gyeonggi-do (2014) Implementation plan of Gyeonggi-do for 2nd air quality management policy in Seoul metropolitan area.
Headline Jeju (2014) http://www.headlinejeju.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=206527
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
Ministry of Environment (2013) The 2nd basic plan for improvement of air quality in Seoul metropolitan area.
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
GAINS-Korea를 활용한 온실가스 및 대기오염물질 동시 저감을 위한 정책 효과 분석 연구
한국대기환경학회지(국문)
2019 .10
-
배출원 기반 대기 중 농도 감축 정책에 대한 제고 - 광주 및 서울시 관측 농도 사례 분석
한국대기환경학회지(국문)
2020 .04
-
The Status and Policy of Domestic Electric Vehicle Supply
한국자기학회 학술연구발표회 논문개요집
2018 .11
-
기후변화 적응대책의 리스크 저감효과 분석 방법론 개발: 생태계 부문의 산불 적응대책을 중심으로
한국기후변화학회지
2023 .12
-
충청남도의 지역별 오염 특성과 관리방안 연구: 농도 및 배출량 분석을 중심으로
한국대기환경학회지(국문)
2025 .02
-
제3차 대기환경개선 종합계획의 의의와 정책 이행 방향
한국대기환경학회지(국문)
2023 .10
-
CMIP6 기후변화 시나리오를 활용한 아시아 지역 초미세먼지 미래전망 및 장기노출에 따른 대기질 영향 분석
한국기상학회 학술대회 논문집
2021 .10
-
Air Quality Policies and Plans in Seoul
한국대기환경학회 학술대회논문집
2020 .10
-
Environmental Assessment of Smart Grid Station Project Centered on Pilot Project of Korea Electric Power Corporation Building
한국기후변화학회지
2016 .09
-
수도권 대기환경정책 효과분석 및 개선방안 연구
한국대기환경학회 학술대회논문집
2022 .10
-
Double-entry accounting system for greenhouse gases : Can carbon neutrality mitigate climate change?
한국기후변화학회지
2023 .06
-
기후변화정책 우선순위 연구
한국환경과학회지
2016 .04
-
계절관리제 기간 중 동일 분류 종관 기상장에서 나타나는 PM2.5 농도 차이 발생에 관한 연구
한국대기환경학회 학술대회논문집
2023 .10
-
계절관리제 시행에 따른 공기질 지수 변화 분석 및 미세먼지 건강 영향 평가
한국대기환경학회 학술대회논문집
2022 .10
-
북한 산림복원의 생태계 서비스 기반 경제적 가치평가
환경생물
2021 .01
-
베이지안 네트워크를 이용한 기후변화 적응대책 정책평가: 부산광역시를 대상으로
한국기후변화학회지
2022 .10
-
국내 기준성 대기오염물질의 권역별 장기 추이 및 원인 분석 : PM10과 오존을 중심으로
한국대기환경학회지(국문)
2018 .02
-
Scenarios of Circular Waste Management Systems in Asia: Impacts on Climate, Air Quality and Policy
한국대기환경학회 학술대회논문집
2022 .10
-
LAMP 기반 지역 초미세먼지 농도 기여도 평가 및 정책 모듈 활용방안
한국대기환경학회 학술대회논문집
2023 .10
-
대기관리정책의 효율성과 이행평가
한국대기환경학회 학술대회논문집
2022 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
중국 산둥반도 배출량 변화와 한국 대기질의 연관성 검토
김현철
,
권슬기
,
김병욱
외 1명
한국대기환경학회지(국문)
2018
.04
전력산업의 온실가스 배출요인 분석 및 감축 방안 연구
조용성
한국기후변화학회지
2017
.12
Fire, explosion and safety Hazard identification (HAZID) of the entire methanol dual fueled system and ship
Hamid Etemad
,
Jae-Hyuk Choi
Journal of Advanced Marine Engineering and Technology (JAMET)
2017
.12
이미다클로프리드 저항성 벼멸구의 살충제 교차저항성과 두 종류 벼 품종(친농과 추청)에서의 발육특성
정인홍
,
전성욱
,
이상구
외 7명
농약과학회지
2017
.12
재무비율분석을 중심으로 한 패션기업의 경영성과 특성
지혜경
복식
2017
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-539-001745452