메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국유럽학회 유럽연구 유럽연구 제11권
발행연도
2000.6
수록면
297 - 326 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
New Round has already been prearranged at the Uruguay Round t and its main strategic conflicts are centered on the liberalization of agricultural trade between importing and exporting countries. Considering the extreme sensitivity and short history of multilateral negotiations of this sector, the scope for successive result from the negotiations seems by no means great. Moreover, the obvious conflicts between the two super powers, United States and tire European Union, on various issues may lead to significant weakening of the leadership role of the Round, eventually threatening the future of the WTO multilateral trading system itself: ASEM is not well positioned to aggressively and successfully pull the negotiations because of divergent interests between its member countries and the weak geopolitical relationship in the tri-polar trade relations. However, it is possible that the ASEM may contribute to some extent to bringing about a succesful conclusion of the negotiations by reconciling conflicting interests between its member countries and by checking somewhat unreasonable U.S. attitude and control toward the negotiations. As long as it could manage to construct such a cooperative scheme at this moment, ASEM will be able to find a great opportunity for its future development, based on which the balance and stability of . the tri-polar system could be guaranteed, which will then greatly contribute to establishment of a basis for a sound multilateral trading system and for the stability of the world economy.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-030-001515021