개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Perpetually invading the coastal regions and harming people as well as stealing properties, the Japanese invaders were considered as the main enemy to the national defense policy of Joseon. Accordingly, Joseon used the lord of Tsushima in order to subdue the invaders. However, as the Japanese invaders consisted of pirates of different nationalities, the Tsushima lord did not have absolute power or authority over them. Nevertheless, Joseon maintained a hard-line policy instead of developing more sophisticated policy based on thorough analysis of the likelihood of invasion and preparing measures against different groups.
As a result, with rigorous preparation including selection of landing site in advance, the Japanese invaders carried out Eulmyo Invasion. They used a deceptive tactic in order to induce minimal army from Joseon and secured a dominant position. Also, by dominating a major site as their foothold, they blocked assistance from other regions and destroyed the Joseon army including the regional commander during battle. This not only caused mayhem in the command system but also demoralized Joseon army.
However, despite the disadvantageous situation, the commanders in Jeollado provided soldiers based on the regional defense system, and strove to limit the invasion by the Japanese. Particularly, the Yeongamseong battle, which marked a watershed in the invasion, demonstrated the rational response of the commanders who succeeded in preventing the Japanese invaders from expanding their domain. Later, the regional commanders were recognized for their achievement by being granted honor.
Meanwhile, during Eulmyo Invasion, the central government failed to operate effectively. Especially, it did not provide adequate military force and supplies, causing difficulties to the regional army. Furthermore, during the invasion, the central government officials of Joseon failed to take practical measures and only used the invasion as a pretext to expand their political authority. Therefore, it is necessary to reevaluate Eulmyo Invasion based on the efficient response provided in the battle, as opposed to unsuccessful diplomatic policy and strategically inadequate measures provided by the central government.
As a result, with rigorous preparation including selection of landing site in advance, the Japanese invaders carried out Eulmyo Invasion. They used a deceptive tactic in order to induce minimal army from Joseon and secured a dominant position. Also, by dominating a major site as their foothold, they blocked assistance from other regions and destroyed the Joseon army including the regional commander during battle. This not only caused mayhem in the command system but also demoralized Joseon army.
However, despite the disadvantageous situation, the commanders in Jeollado provided soldiers based on the regional defense system, and strove to limit the invasion by the Japanese. Particularly, the Yeongamseong battle, which marked a watershed in the invasion, demonstrated the rational response of the commanders who succeeded in preventing the Japanese invaders from expanding their domain. Later, the regional commanders were recognized for their achievement by being granted honor.
Meanwhile, during Eulmyo Invasion, the central government failed to operate effectively. Especially, it did not provide adequate military force and supplies, causing difficulties to the regional army. Furthermore, during the invasion, the central government officials of Joseon failed to take practical measures and only used the invasion as a pretext to expand their political authority. Therefore, it is necessary to reevaluate Eulmyo Invasion based on the efficient response provided in the battle, as opposed to unsuccessful diplomatic policy and strategically inadequate measures provided by the central government.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 조선의 對倭政策과 왜구의 전란 계획
3. 을묘왜변의 발발과 전투현장의 군사적 분석
4. 을묘왜변에 대한 중앙정부의 판단과 조치
5. 맺음말
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
을묘왜변 제주 대첩의 재조명과 역사적 의의
제주도연구
2023 .02
-
식민지 조선영화 속 실존 인물의 표상: 1940년대 초 상영된 현존 극영화를 중심으로
동북아연구(구 통일문제연구)
2018 .01
-
임진왜란시 조선수군의 승전요인 – 조선초기 왜란에 의한 조선수군 변화를 중심으로 -
군사
2023 .09
-
임진왜란 전후 조선 수군의 군사체제 비교 연구
군사
2015 .12
-
이정암과 연안성 전투의 군사적 의의
한국군사학논총
2019 .01
-
일제강점기 잡지에 내재된 식민지 조선인식 ‒모던일본 조선판(モダン日本 朝鮮版)과재조일본인의 조선인식을 중심으로‒
일본근대학연구
2019 .01
-
음식이 조선왕들의 질병과 사망에 미친 영향에 관한 연구 (조선전기: 태조~성종)
한국외식산업학회지
2020 .06
-
『普通学校修身書』の朝鮮·日本人物の分布と比較分析
일본어교육연구
2016 .01
-
Moving Beyond Politics: Western Scholarship on Joseon
Korea Journal
2021 .09
-
Korea/Culture as the Chosen Photographic Object: Focusing on Culture Joseon
Korea Journal
2015 .01
-
임진왜란 중 정문부와 윤탁연의 갈등 양상 연구
동북아 문화연구
2020 .12
-
해방 직후 일본군의 한반도 점령 실태와 귀환
한국학논총
2017 .01
-
월경(越境)하는 ‘조선’ - 『관광조선』과 『모던일본 조선판』의 사이에서 -
日本學(일본학)
2016 .01
-
적대국·동맹국 게임을 통한 병자호란 발발 원인 재해석
한국군사학논집
2020 .06
-
1944년 식민지 조선영화계의 정책적 특수성에 관한 연구: ‘결전비상조치’에 따른 제도적 변화상을 통해
동북아연구(구 통일문제연구)
2015 .12
-
러일전쟁 최후의 해상전투, ‘동해해전’ 재구성
군사
2015 .12
-
개화기 윤치호의 군사문제에 관한 이해
군사
2020 .09
-
병자호란 이후 朝明 비밀접촉의 전개
군사
2017 .06
-
일제강점기 李王家 世襲財産의 종류와 기능
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2016 .10
-
임진왜란 시 청주성 전투에 관한 실증적 고찰
한국군사학논총
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-390-000972812