개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.10
- 수록면
- 1 - 106 (106page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background of Research
There are many family farms in rural Korea. Most of those families can’t maintain their livelihood without jobs other than their own farming. Pluriactivities are not only very important livelihood strategy for farm households but also parts of the mechanisms that support rural communities’ social and economic sustainability. This study aims to figure out the current pluriactivities in rural Korea in order to give some implications for policy agendas about agriculture and rural development.
Method of Research
Various methods and data were employed. The preceding researches have been reviewed. Analysis on the current situation of pluriactivity has been conducted with a survey and some interviews. On the basis of these analyses, we drew some implications for policy-makers and researchers to consider when they design any policies.
Research Results and Implications
There has been a perspective on agricultural/rural development, that agricultural development which is represented by ‘scale enlargement’ and ‘professionalization’ is the very rural development. This perspective is a powerful one in designing national agricultural and rural development policy. Based on this perspective, pluriactivities which are found in many family farms are just minor and temporary phenomena. However, in rural Korea, pluriactivity is prevalent livelihood strategies of farm families. Pluriactivity family farms are 83.7% of all the family farms, implying that family farming is the most dominant mode of farming in Korea.
We specified four family farms’ pathways by the levels of income from their own farming and other gainful activities, as followings: (1) scale enlargement and specialized farm development, (2) deactivation of agriculture, (3) peasant development, and (4) pauperization. In rural Korea, pauperization and deactivation of agriculture were furthered for the recent 10 years. Prices of agricultural products became so low that continuing to farm was hardly worthwhile in many rural communities, so deactivation of agriculture has occurred. For some farm households, the social networks that sustain their livelihoods have been eroded. Because of severe decrease in population, many farm households lost access to another economic activity, so pauperization has occurred.
Much of pluriactivities, to be exact, off-farm activities are media for farm families to participate in community. According to the structure of labour markets in the specific rural areas, those activities are limited or opened to farm households. In recent years, we can find vigorous collective actions in some rural communities such as community businesses, cooperative movements and various community development activities. Those activities can be regarded as endogenous rural development projects. And, in many cases, those activities appear as off-farm activities.
There are many family farms in rural Korea. Most of those families can’t maintain their livelihood without jobs other than their own farming. Pluriactivities are not only very important livelihood strategy for farm households but also parts of the mechanisms that support rural communities’ social and economic sustainability. This study aims to figure out the current pluriactivities in rural Korea in order to give some implications for policy agendas about agriculture and rural development.
Method of Research
Various methods and data were employed. The preceding researches have been reviewed. Analysis on the current situation of pluriactivity has been conducted with a survey and some interviews. On the basis of these analyses, we drew some implications for policy-makers and researchers to consider when they design any policies.
Research Results and Implications
There has been a perspective on agricultural/rural development, that agricultural development which is represented by ‘scale enlargement’ and ‘professionalization’ is the very rural development. This perspective is a powerful one in designing national agricultural and rural development policy. Based on this perspective, pluriactivities which are found in many family farms are just minor and temporary phenomena. However, in rural Korea, pluriactivity is prevalent livelihood strategies of farm families. Pluriactivity family farms are 83.7% of all the family farms, implying that family farming is the most dominant mode of farming in Korea.
We specified four family farms’ pathways by the levels of income from their own farming and other gainful activities, as followings: (1) scale enlargement and specialized farm development, (2) deactivation of agriculture, (3) peasant development, and (4) pauperization. In rural Korea, pauperization and deactivation of agriculture were furthered for the recent 10 years. Prices of agricultural products became so low that continuing to farm was hardly worthwhile in many rural communities, so deactivation of agriculture has occurred. For some farm households, the social networks that sustain their livelihoods have been eroded. Because of severe decrease in population, many farm households lost access to another economic activity, so pauperization has occurred.
Much of pluriactivities, to be exact, off-farm activities are media for farm families to participate in community. According to the structure of labour markets in the specific rural areas, those activities are limited or opened to farm households. In recent years, we can find vigorous collective actions in some rural communities such as community businesses, cooperative movements and various community development activities. Those activities can be regarded as endogenous rural development projects. And, in many cases, those activities appear as off-farm activities.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[요약]
[ABSTRACT]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 배경
2. 연구의 목적
3. 연구내용 및 방법
[제2장 선행 연구 검토]
1. 다면적 활동의 개념
2. 농가의 다면적 활동을 바라보는 관점
3. 농촌 발전 맥락에서 다면적 활동의 위상
[제3장 농가의 다면적 활동 실태]
1. 농가 소득과 다면적 활동
2. 농가 구성원의 자가영농 외 경제 활동 참여 실태
3. 다면적 활동의 종류와 형태
[제4장 농촌 지역사회의 지속가능성과 농가의 다면적 활동]
1. 농촌 지역사회의 상업적 · 공공적 서비스와 농가의 다면적 활동
2. 농촌 노동시장의 특징과 농가의 다면적 활동
3. 농촌 사회의 지속가능성 측면에서 본 다면적 활동의 새로운 경향
[제5장 요약 및 결론]
1. 요약
2. 결론
[부록]
[참고문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
살림살이 전략으로서 다중경제활동과 농가의 분화
농촌사회
2017 .06
-
경기도 사회농업 활성화 방안 연구
정책연구
2022 .07
-
K-FARM 프레임워크 구축을 위한 국내외 사례 분석 및 유형분류
농촌계획
2021 .01
-
사회적 농업의 실태와 중장기 정책 방향
한국농촌경제연구원 정책연구보고
2017 .09
-
빅데이터 분석을 통한 팜파티 방향 탐색에 관한 연구
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2019 .08
-
청년후계농사업 선정 농가의 가족기업농적 성격 고찰
농업경영.정책연구
2022 .09
-
영농형태별 농가의 규모 변환 확률 분석
농업경제연구
2024 .06
-
농업소득 변동성을 고려한 농외소득활동 참여 및 농외소득 결정요인 분석
농업경제연구
2018 .01
-
The Relationship between Farm Characteristics and Farm Productivity
농업경제연구
2020 .01
-
경제적 위기 농가의 특징 분석
농업경영.정책연구
2015 .01
-
사회적 농업, 농업과 농촌의 탈영토화 - 홍성군 장곡면 사례 -
농촌지도와 개발
2018 .01
-
The Impact of Off-Farm Income on Food Expenditure
농업경제연구
2017 .01
-
농업생산 양극화 추이에 대한 연구
산경연구논집
2017 .11
-
스마트팜 투자사업의 경제성 분석
한국지역개발학회 학술대회
2024 .11
-
팜파티 속성에 대한 중요도-만족도 분석(IPA) 연구
농촌지도와 개발
2015 .01
-
제주마 생산 농가 경영 실태 조사 연구
농업경영.정책연구
2024 .03
-
귀농·귀촌 인구 전망과 정책 방향
농촌지도와 개발
2017 .01
-
농가 경영이양에 대한 영향요인
농촌지도와 개발
2018 .01
-
한국 농촌교육농장 활성화 방안- IPA 기법을 활용하여 -
농촌계획
2015 .01
-
Crop Insurance, Farm Input Use, and Moral Hazard Heterogeneous Effects of Crop Insurance on Farm Input Use across Farm Types
농업경제연구
2024 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
농촌융복합산업 경영체의 성장단계별 특징
김정태
농촌사회
2016
.12
귀농 · 귀촌 증가 추세와 정책 과제
송미령
,
성주인
,
김정섭
외 1명
한국농촌경제연구원 농정포커스
2015
.04
커뮤니터 비즈니스 중장기 육성방안(1/3차연도) : 지연성 농업경영체의 경영실태와 성과
박문호
,
김정승
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2011
.11
커뮤니티 비즈니스의 중장기 육성전략(2/3차연도)
김태곤
,
김정섭
,
허주녕
외 1명
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2012
.12
농업법인경영체 경영실태 분석
박문호
,
임지은
한국농촌경제연구원 정책연구보고
2014
.01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-522-002359575