본 연구는 체육시설 유형에 따른 생활체육 배드민턴 참가자의 참여정도, 참여동기, 운동지속의 차이를 비교·분석하는데 목적이 있다. 이 연구에는 P광역시 소재 3개의 공공체육시설 참가자와 민간체육시설 3곳의 배드민턴 참가자 242명이 참여했으며, 체육활동 참여 정도, 동기, 그리고 운동지속에 관한 설문지 응답에 참여했다. 자료 분석에는 SPSS WIN 20.0과 AMOS 20.0 통계프로그램을 이용하였으며 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 체육시설 유형에 따른 참여정도는 민간체육시설 참가자가 공공체육시설 참가자보다 참여기간과 참여강도에서 통계적으로 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 체육시설 유형에 따른 참여동기는 민간체육시설 참가자의 외적동기가 공공체육시설 참가자보다 통계적으로 높게 나타났다. 셋째, 체육시설 유형에 따른 운동지속은 민간체육시설 참가자가 공공체육시설 참가자보다 운동능력과 운동환경에서 통계적으로 높게 나타났다. 넷째, 체육시설 유형에 따른 참여동기가 운동지속에 미치는 영향에서 공공체육시설 참가자는 운동습관, 운동관심, 운동친구에서 내적동기가 통계적으로 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 민간체육시설 참가자는 운동능력, 운동습관, 운동환경, 운동관심, 그리고 운동친구에서 내적동기가 통계적으로 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 결과적으로 공공체육시설과 민간체육시설의 체육시설 유형에 따라 배드민턴 클럽 회원들의 참여정도, 참여동기, 운동지속에서 차이가 나타났다. 따라서 생활체육 참여인구의 저변확대를 위해서는 소프트웨어 측면의 다각적인 개발과 하드웨어 측면의 체육시설 분야에 대한 연구의 세분화가 필요하겠다.
The purpose of this study is to analyze differences about participation level, participation motivation and exercise adherence between Private Physical Facilities participants and participants of the public physical facilities of leisure sports badminton participants. To achieve the aim of this study, this research drew the following conclusion through making the quantitative investigation on this subject using SPSS WIN 20.0 and AMOS 20.0 statistics programs by the 242 participants of three Private Physical Facilities and three public physical facilities in P Metropolitan City. First, in the participation level of the Private Physical Facilities participants and the participants of public physical facilities, the Private Physical Facilities participants were higher than those of public physical facilities in the participation period and participation time. Second, in the participation motivation of the Private Physical Facilities participants and the participants of public physical facilities, the Private Physical Facilities participants were higher than those of public physical facilities, the Private Physical Facilities participants were higher than those of public physical facilities in the external motivation. Third, in the exercise adherence of the Private Physical Facilities participants and the participants of public physical facilities, the Private Physical Facilities participants were higher than those of public physical facilities in the exercise abilities and exercise environment. Fourth, according to the participation motivation of the participants of the Private Physical Facilities and those of the Public Physical Facilities influences exercise adherence, the intrinsic motivation of the participation motivations from the participants of Private Physical Facilities has brought about meaningful effect on the exercise abilities, exercise habits, exercise environments, exercise interests, exercise partners and all factors of exercise adherence, the intrinsic motivation of them from those of the Public Physical Facilities has brought about meaningful effects on the exercise habits, exercise interests and exercise partners. This study confirmed the difference in the participation level, the participation motivation, and the exercise adherence according to the participation type of the leisure sports badminton. Therefore Changes in operations and program suitable to needs of the badminton of participants. the customized badminton program of the management or the expert on badminton has to change. In addition The base to be able to have a sense of purpose and belonging of the participants by providing opportunities in the game of participants of the public physical facilities.