지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.92 No.4
- 발행연도
- 2017.4
- 수록면
- 214 - 220 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Liver volumetry is a vital component in living donor liver transplantation to determine an adequate graft volume that meets the metabolic demands of the recipient and at the same time ensures donor safety. Most institutions use preoperative contrast-enhanced CT image-based software programs to estimate graft volume. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 2 liver volumetry programs (Rapidia vs. Dr. Liver) in preoperative right liver graft estimation compared with real graft weight.
Methods: Data from 215 consecutive right lobe living donors between October 2013 and August 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred seven patients were enrolled in Rapidia group and 108 patients were included in the Dr. Liver group. Estimated graft volumes generated by both software programs were compared with real graft weight measured during surgery, and further classified into minimal difference (≤15%) and big difference (>15%). Correlation coefficients and degree of difference were determined. Linear regressions were calculated and results depicted as scatterplots.
Results: Minimal difference was observed in 69.4% of cases from Dr. Liver group and big difference was seen in 44.9% of cases from Rapidia group (P = 0.035). Linear regression analysis showed positive correlation in both groups (P < 0.01). However, the correlation coefficient was better for the Dr. Liver group (R2 = 0.719), than for the Rapidia group (R2 = 0.688).
Conclusion: Dr. Liver can accurately predict right liver graft size better and faster than Rapidia, and can facilitate preoperative planning in living donor liver transplantation.
Methods: Data from 215 consecutive right lobe living donors between October 2013 and August 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred seven patients were enrolled in Rapidia group and 108 patients were included in the Dr. Liver group. Estimated graft volumes generated by both software programs were compared with real graft weight measured during surgery, and further classified into minimal difference (≤15%) and big difference (>15%). Correlation coefficients and degree of difference were determined. Linear regressions were calculated and results depicted as scatterplots.
Results: Minimal difference was observed in 69.4% of cases from Dr. Liver group and big difference was seen in 44.9% of cases from Rapidia group (P = 0.035). Linear regression analysis showed positive correlation in both groups (P < 0.01). However, the correlation coefficient was better for the Dr. Liver group (R2 = 0.719), than for the Rapidia group (R2 = 0.688).
Conclusion: Dr. Liver can accurately predict right liver graft size better and faster than Rapidia, and can facilitate preoperative planning in living donor liver transplantation.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The correlation between preoperative volumetry and actual graft weight of liver according to the donor age
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
Multivariable linear model for predicting graft weight based on 3-dimensional volumetry in regards to body weight change of living liver donor: an observational cohort study
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2024 .08
-
Liver transplantation from discarded liver grafts: Expanding the donor liver pool in Mexico
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
Long-term Outcomes of Live Liver Donors
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Elderly living liver donors in Korea
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
The Correlation between Preoperative Volumetry and Actual Graft Weight of Liver according to the Donor Age in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
-
Machine learning improves the accuracy of graft weight prediction in living donor liver transplantation
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Liver
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Is there an age limit to be a liver donor?
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Living donor liver transplantation in polycystic liver disease: The recipient liver splitting method
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Huge Polycystic Liver Disease with Recipient Liver Splitting Method
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Reuse of liver allograft from a brain-dead recipient: A case report
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2020 .05
-
Impact of extended living donor criteria focusing on donor safety in living donor liver transplantation
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
Biliary Complications after Living Donor Liver Transplantation Differ from Those after Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation
Gut and Liver
2022 .03
-
Long-term outcomes of liver transplantation using grafts from donors with active hepatitis B virus replication: a multicenter cohort study
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2023 .04
-
Living donor liver transplantation using donors older than 50 years of age: Recipient criteria and donor risk
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Outcome of deceased donor liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2016 .04
-
The Correlation Between Pre-operative Volumetry and Real Graft Weight : Comparison of Two Volumetry Programs
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2016 .04
-
Outcomes of deceased donor liver transplantation from elderly donors
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-514-002372407